The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/19] locking/lockdep: Define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY for chain keys to start with
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:57:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318085733.3143-10-duyuyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190318085733.3143-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>

Chain keys are computed using Jenkins hash function, which needs an initial
hash to start with. Dedicate a macro to make this clear and configurable. A
later patch changes this initial chain key.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |  1 +
 init/init_task.c         |  2 +-
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 49b928f..dd8cf33 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct lock_chain {
  * bitfield and hitting the BUG in hlock_class().
  */
 #define MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS		((1UL << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS) - 1)
+#define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY		0
 
 struct held_lock {
 	/*
diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
index 9460878..ff3e8bf 100644
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	.lockdep_depth = 0, /* no locks held yet */
-	.curr_chain_key = 0,
+	.curr_chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY,
 	.lockdep_recursion = 0,
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 737fe0a..5459d37 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static inline u64 iterate_chain_key(u64 key, u32 idx)
 inline void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	task->lockdep_depth = 0; /* no locks held yet */
-	task->curr_chain_key = 0;
+	task->curr_chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 	task->lockdep_recursion = 0;
 }
 
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static bool class_lock_list_valid(struct lock_class *c, struct list_head *h)
 static bool check_lock_chain_key(struct lock_chain *chain)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-	u64 chain_key = 0;
+	u64 chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++)
@@ -2430,7 +2430,7 @@ static u64 print_chain_key_iteration(int class_idx, u64 chain_key)
 print_chain_keys_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock_next)
 {
 	struct held_lock *hlock;
-	u64 chain_key = 0;
+	u64 chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 	int i = get_first_held_lock(curr, hlock_next);
 
@@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ static u64 print_chain_key_iteration(int class_idx, u64 chain_key)
 static void print_chain_keys_chain(struct lock_chain *chain)
 {
 	int i;
-	u64 chain_key = 0;
+	u64 chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 	int class_id;
 
 	printk("depth: %u\n", chain->depth);
@@ -2754,7 +2754,7 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr)
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
 	struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock = NULL;
 	unsigned int i;
-	u64 chain_key = 0;
+	u64 chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
@@ -2778,7 +2778,7 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr)
 
 		if (prev_hlock && (prev_hlock->irq_context !=
 							hlock->irq_context))
-			chain_key = 0;
+			chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 		chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, hlock->class_idx);
 		prev_hlock = hlock;
 	}
@@ -3691,14 +3691,14 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 		/*
 		 * How can we have a chain hash when we ain't got no keys?!
 		 */
-		if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(chain_key != 0))
+		if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(chain_key != INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY))
 			return 0;
 		chain_head = 1;
 	}
 
 	hlock->prev_chain_key = chain_key;
 	if (separate_irq_context(curr, hlock)) {
-		chain_key = 0;
+		chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 		chain_head = 1;
 	}
 	chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, class_idx);
@@ -4539,7 +4539,7 @@ static void remove_class_from_lock_chain(struct pending_free *pf,
 	return;
 
 recalc:
-	chain_key = 0;
+	chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
 	for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++)
 		chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, chain_hlocks[i] + 1);
 	if (chain->depth && chain->chain_key == chain_key)
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18  8:57 [PATCH v2 00/19] locking/lockdep: Add comments and make some code Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] locking/lockdep: Change all print_*() return type to void Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  9:45   ` Joe Perches
2019-03-19  3:28     ` Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:30     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] locking/lockdep: Add description and explanation in lockdep design doc Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] locking/lockdep: Remove useless conditional macro Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust indents for function definitions Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:33   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] locking/lockdep: Print the right depth for chain key colission Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] locking/lockdep: Update obsolete struct field description Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:35   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] locking/lockdep: Use lockdep_init_task for task initiation consistently Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock struct Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:45   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] locking/lockdep: Update comment Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary function pointer argument Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] locking/lockdep: Change type of the element field in circular_queue Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:51   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] locking/lockdep: Remove __cq_empty() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:54   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-20  2:30     ` Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] locking/lockdep: Use function pointer to avoid constant checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] locking/lockdep: Combine check_noncircular and check_redundant Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] locking/lockdep: Update comments on dependency search Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] locking/lockdep: Change if to else-if when checking bfs errors Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 17:19     ` Joe Perches
2019-03-20  2:02     ` Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190318085733.3143-10-duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox