The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust indents for function definitions
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:57:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318085733.3143-6-duyuyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190318085733.3143-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>

Being paranoid to see function arguments lines are aligned.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index dea495b..320ab62 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static inline unsigned int  __cq_get_elem_count(struct circular_queue *cq)
 }
 
 static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock,
-					struct lock_list *parent)
+				      struct lock_list *parent)
 {
 	unsigned long nr;
 
@@ -1413,19 +1413,17 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
-			void *data,
-			int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
-			struct lock_list **target_entry)
+static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, void *data,
+				 int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
+				 struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 1);
 
 }
 
-static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
-			void *data,
-			int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
-			struct lock_list **target_entry)
+static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, void *data,
+				  int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
+				  struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 0);
 
@@ -1507,8 +1505,8 @@ static void print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src,
  */
 static noinline void
 print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth,
-			struct held_lock *check_src,
-			struct held_lock *check_tgt)
+			  struct held_lock *check_src,
+			  struct held_lock *check_tgt)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 
@@ -1653,7 +1651,7 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
  */
 static noinline int
 check_noncircular(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target,
-		struct lock_list **target_entry)
+		  struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	int result;
 
@@ -1703,7 +1701,7 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
  */
 static int
 find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
-			struct lock_list **target_entry)
+		    struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	int result;
 
@@ -1726,7 +1724,7 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
  */
 static int
 find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
-			struct lock_list **target_entry)
+		     struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	int result;
 
@@ -2018,7 +2016,7 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 
 static int
 check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-		struct held_lock *next)
+		   struct held_lock *next)
 {
 #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE)						\
 	if (!check_irq_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE))	\
@@ -2392,7 +2390,7 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i)
  * Returns the index of the first held_lock of the current chain
  */
 static inline int get_first_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr,
-					struct held_lock *hlock)
+				      struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct held_lock *hlock_curr;
@@ -2487,8 +2485,8 @@ static void print_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
  * Returns: 0 not passed, 1 passed
  */
 static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
-			struct held_lock *hlock,
-			struct lock_chain *chain)
+			      struct held_lock *hlock,
+			      struct lock_chain *chain)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
 	int i, j, id;
@@ -2675,7 +2673,7 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 }
 
 static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
-		struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+			  struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -3032,7 +3030,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+	      enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
 	int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
 	int read = new_bit & LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK;
@@ -3060,7 +3058,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
 	 * states.
 	 */
 	if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
-			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
+	    !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -3071,8 +3069,8 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
 			return 0;
 
 		if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS &&
-			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK,
-				state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
+		    !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK,
+			   state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
 			return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -3338,7 +3336,7 @@ static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
 }
 
 static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
-		struct held_lock *hlock)
+				struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
 	unsigned int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 
@@ -3364,14 +3362,14 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
 
 static inline
 int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+		  enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
 	WARN_ON(1); /* Impossible innit? when we don't have TRACE_IRQFLAG */
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static inline int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr,
-		struct held_lock *hlock)
+				struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -3382,7 +3380,7 @@ static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
 }
 
 static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
-		struct held_lock *hlock)
+				       struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -3393,7 +3391,7 @@ static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
  * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition:
  */
 static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-			     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
 	unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1;
 
@@ -3836,7 +3834,7 @@ static struct held_lock *find_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr,
 }
 
 static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth,
-			      int idx)
+				int idx)
 {
 	struct held_lock *hlock;
 
@@ -4210,8 +4208,8 @@ void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
  * and also avoid lockdep recursion:
  */
 void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
-			  int trylock, int read, int check,
-			  struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip)
+		  int trylock, int read, int check,
+		  struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -4230,8 +4228,7 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_acquire);
 
-void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested,
-			  unsigned long ip)
+void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18  8:57 [PATCH v2 00/19] locking/lockdep: Add comments and make some code Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] locking/lockdep: Change all print_*() return type to void Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  9:45   ` Joe Perches
2019-03-19  3:28     ` Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:30     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] locking/lockdep: Add description and explanation in lockdep design doc Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] locking/lockdep: Remove useless conditional macro Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-03-19 16:33   ` [PATCH v2 05/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust indents for function definitions Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] locking/lockdep: Print the right depth for chain key colission Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] locking/lockdep: Update obsolete struct field description Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:35   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] locking/lockdep: Use lockdep_init_task for task initiation consistently Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] locking/lockdep: Define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY for chain keys to start with Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock struct Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:45   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] locking/lockdep: Update comment Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary function pointer argument Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] locking/lockdep: Change type of the element field in circular_queue Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:51   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] locking/lockdep: Remove __cq_empty() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:54   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-20  2:30     ` Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] locking/lockdep: Use function pointer to avoid constant checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] locking/lockdep: Combine check_noncircular and check_redundant Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] locking/lockdep: Update comments on dependency search Yuyang Du
2019-03-18  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] locking/lockdep: Change if to else-if when checking bfs errors Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 17:19     ` Joe Perches
2019-03-20  2:02     ` Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190318085733.3143-6-duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox