public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@gmail.com>
Cc: johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: greybus: Cleanup in header file control.h
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:10:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415131002.GC775@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405201437.3689-1-madhumithabiw@gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:14:37PM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Fix a blank line after function/struct/union/enum
> declarations. Also, convert to_gb_control()  macro into an inline
> function in order to maintain Linux kernel coding style based
> on which the inline function is preferable over the macro.

There are about 1200 macros wrapping container_of() in the kernel, so
this is a common pattern which does not need to be changed (by contrast,
only a handful container_of are wrapped by functions).

> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/control.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> index 3a29ec05f631..a681ef74e7fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct gb_control {
>  	char *vendor_string;
>  	char *product_string;
>  };
> -#define to_gb_control(d) container_of(d, struct gb_control, dev)
> +

No need for a blank line either as the macro is closely related to the
preceding struct declaration.

> +static inline struct gb_control *to_gb_control(struct device *d)
> +{
> +	return container_of(d, struct gb_control, dev);
> +}

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-05 20:14 [PATCH] Staging: greybus: Cleanup in header file control.h Madhumitha Prabakaran
2019-04-15 13:10 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2019-04-15 13:33   ` Dan Carpenter
2019-04-15 14:12     ` Johan Hovold
2019-04-15 14:40       ` Dan Carpenter
2019-04-15 15:03         ` Johan Hovold
2019-04-15 16:04           ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190415131002.GC775@localhost \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhumithabiw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox