From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 15:20:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507152016.77f7a3af@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507191412.n4uhoyfwagagyfwi@treble>
On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:14:12 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 03:01:53PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > How's this?
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> > From d29dc2e9e0275c9857932b80cebc01551b669efb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 15:11:17 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
> >
> > In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push
> > the return address onto the stack. But because the breakpoint exception
> > frame is added to the stack when the breakpoint is hit, there's no room to
> > add the address onto the stack and return to the address of the emulated
> > called funtion.
>
> The 2nd sentence can probably be removed since it's technically no
> longer true, thanks to the previous patch.
>
> > This helper functions are added:
>
> "These"
New version:
x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push
the return address onto the stack. The x86_64 int3 handler adds a small gap
to allow the stack to grow some. Use this gap to add the return address to
be able to emulate a call instruction at the breakpoint location.
These helper functions are added:
int3_emulate_jmp(): changes the location of the regs->ip to return there.
(The next two are only for x86_64)
int3_emulate_push(): to push the address onto the gap in the stack
int3_emulate_call(): push the return address and change regs->ip
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 17:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86_64/ftrace: Emulate calls from int3 when patching functions Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] x86_64: Add gap to int3 to allow for call emulation Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 19:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-05-07 19:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 20:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ftrace/x86_64: Emulate call function while updating in breakpoint handler Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190507152016.77f7a3af@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox