The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 15:58:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507155817.2d08d0eb@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507194925.qndvv67rinrmbefj@treble>

On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:49:25 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> > New version:
> > 
> >     x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
> >     
> >     In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push  
> 
> Sorry to keep nitpicking, but "call functions" -> "function calls" would
> sound more accurate to me (in both subject and description).

I disagree ;-)

Matters how you look at it. I look at it as emulating the "call"
function, not a function call. Like emulating an "addl" function, or a
"jmp" function.

See?

To remove the ambiguity, I could replace "function" with "instruction".

> 
> Otherwise it looks good.

Thanks!

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-07 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-07 17:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86_64/ftrace: Emulate calls from int3 when patching functions Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] x86_64: Add gap to int3 to allow for call emulation Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:56   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 18:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:53   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:01     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 19:14       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:20         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 19:49           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 19:58             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-05-07 20:02               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ftrace/x86_64: Emulate call function while updating in breakpoint handler Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190507155817.2d08d0eb@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox