public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Paul Pawlowski <paul@mrarm.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Add support for Apple 2018+ models
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:10:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715081041.GB31791@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71b009057582cd9c82cff2b45bc1af846408bcf7.camel@kernel.crashing.org>

> +	/*
> +	 * Apple 2018 and latter variant has a few issues
> +	 */
> +	NVME_QUIRK_APPLE_2018			= (1 << 10),

We try to have quirks for the actual issue, so this should be one quirk
for the irq vectors issues, and another for the sq entry size.  Note that
NVMe actually has the concept of an I/O queue entry size (IOSQES in the
Cc register based on values reported in the SQES field in Identify
Controller.  Do these controllers report anything interesting there?

At the very least I'd make all the terminology based on that and then
just treat the Apple controllers as a buggy implementation of that model.

Btw, are there open source darwin NVMe driver that could explain this
mess a little better?

> @@ -504,8 +505,11 @@ static inline void nvme_write_sq_db(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, bool write_sq)
>  static void nvme_submit_cmd(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, struct nvme_command *cmd,
>  			    bool write_sq)
>  {
> +	u16 sq_actual_pos;
> +
>  	spin_lock(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
> -	memcpy(&nvmeq->sq_cmds[nvmeq->sq_tail], cmd, sizeof(*cmd));
> +	sq_actual_pos = nvmeq->sq_tail << nvmeq->sq_extra_shift;
> +	memcpy(&nvmeq->sq_cmds[sq_actual_pos], cmd, sizeof(*cmd));

This is a little too magic.  I think we'd better off making sq_cmds
a void array and use manual indexing, at least that makes it very
obvious what is going on.

> -				nvmeq->sq_cmds, SQ_SIZE(nvmeq->q_depth));
> +				nvmeq->sq_cmds, SQ_SIZE(nvmeq));

Btw, chaning SQ_SIZE to take the queue seems like something that should
be split into a prep patch, making the main change a lot smaller.

> -	if (!polled)
> +	if (!polled) {
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * On Apple 2018 or later implementations, only vector 0 is accepted

Please fix the > 80 char line.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-15  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-15  3:43 [PATCH] nvme: Add support for Apple 2018+ models Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-15  8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-07-15  8:43   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-15  9:03     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-15  9:28       ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-15 10:01         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-15 12:29         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190715081041.GB31791@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=paul@mrarm.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox