From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: check exit_signal passed in clone3() call
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:48:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911064852.9f236d4c201b50e14d717c14@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910175852.GA15572@asgard.redhat.com>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:58:52 +0100 Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com> wrote:
> Previously, higher 32 bits of exit_signal fields were lost when
> copied to the kernel args structure (that uses int as a type for the
> respective field). Moreover, as Oleg has noted[1], exit_signal is used
> unchecked, so it has to be checked for sanity before use; for the legacy
> syscalls, applying CSIGNAL mask guarantees that it is at least non-negative;
> however, there's no such thing is done in clone3() code path, and that can
> break at least thread_group_leader.
>
> Checking user-passed exit_signal against ~CSIGNAL mask solves both
> of these problems.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/10/467
>
> * kernel/fork.c (copy_clone_args_from_user): Fail with -EINVAL if
> args.exit_signal has bits set outside CSIGNAL mask.
> (_do_fork): Note that exit_signal is expected to be checked for the
> sanity by the caller.
>
> Fixes: 7f192e3cd316 ("fork: add clone3")
What are the user-visible runtime effects of this bug?
Relatedly, should this fix be backported into -stable kernels? If so, why?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 17:58 [PATCH v2] fork: check exit_signal passed in clone3() call Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-11 13:47 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 13:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-09-11 13:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 14:16 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 14:32 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 15:08 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-09-11 15:20 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 15:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-13 9:07 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-10 17:58 Eugene Syromiatnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911064852.9f236d4c201b50e14d717c14@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox