From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: check exit_signal passed in clone3() call
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:31:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911133119.GA17580@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910175852.GA15572@asgard.redhat.com>
On 09/10, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2338,6 +2338,8 @@ struct mm_struct *copy_init_mm(void)
> *
> * It copies the process, and if successful kick-starts
> * it and waits for it to finish using the VM if required.
> + *
> + * args->exit_signal is expected to be checked for sanity by the caller.
not sure this comment is really useful but it doesn't hurt
> long _do_fork(struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> {
> @@ -2562,6 +2564,16 @@ noinline static int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
> if (copy_from_user(&args, uargs, size))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + /*
> + * exit_signal is confined to CSIGNAL mask in legacy syscalls,
> + * so it is used unchecked deeper in syscall handling routines;
> + * moreover, copying to struct kernel_clone_args.exit_signals
> + * trims higher 32 bits, so it is has to be checked that they
> + * are zero.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(args.exit_signal & ~((u64)CSIGNAL)))
> + return -EINVAL;
OK, agreed. As you pointed out, this doesn't guarantee valid_signal(exit_signal).
But we do no really care as long as it is non-negative, it acts as exit_signal==0.
I have no idea if we want to deny exit_signal >= _NSIG in clone3(), this was always
allowed...
I think this needs the "CC: stable" tag.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 17:58 [PATCH v2] fork: check exit_signal passed in clone3() call Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-09-11 13:47 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 13:48 ` Andrew Morton
2019-09-11 13:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 14:16 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 14:32 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 15:08 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-09-11 15:20 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2019-09-11 15:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-13 9:07 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-11 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-10 17:58 Eugene Syromiatnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911133119.GA17580@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox