public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] locking/lockdep: Track leaked chain_hlocks entries
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:35:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212223525.1652-3-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212223525.1652-1-longman@redhat.com>

If a lock chain contains a class that is zapped, the whole lock chain is
now invalid. There is no point in keeping a partial chain behind hoping
it can be useful. So just dump the corresponding chain_hlocks entries
and account for them in a new nr_leaked_chain_hlocks stat counter which
is shown as part of /proc/lockdep_stats.

This patch also changes the type of nr_chain_hlocks to unsigned integer
to be consistent with the other counters.

A latter patch will try to reuse the freed chain_hlocks entries.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c           | 40 ++++++------------------------
 kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h |  5 ++--
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c      |  4 ++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index c8d0374101b0..d03503b348f1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2624,8 +2624,9 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 
 struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
 static DECLARE_BITMAP(lock_chains_in_use, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
-int nr_chain_hlocks;
 static u16 chain_hlocks[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS];
+unsigned int nr_chain_hlocks;
+unsigned int nr_leaked_chain_hlocks;
 
 struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i)
 {
@@ -4770,57 +4771,32 @@ static void remove_class_from_lock_chain(struct pending_free *pf,
 					 struct lock_class *class)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-	struct lock_chain *new_chain;
-	u64 chain_key;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++) {
 		if (chain_hlocks[i] != class - lock_classes)
 			continue;
-		/* The code below leaks one chain_hlock[] entry. */
-		if (--chain->depth > 0) {
-			memmove(&chain_hlocks[i], &chain_hlocks[i + 1],
-				(chain->base + chain->depth - i) *
-				sizeof(chain_hlocks[0]));
-		}
+		/* Account for leaked chain_hlock[] entries. */
+		nr_leaked_chain_hlocks += chain->depth;
+
 		/*
 		 * Each lock class occurs at most once in a lock chain so once
 		 * we found a match we can break out of this loop.
 		 */
-		goto recalc;
+		goto free_lock_chain;
 	}
 	/* Since the chain has not been modified, return. */
 	return;
 
-recalc:
-	chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY;
-	for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++)
-		chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, chain_hlocks[i]);
-	if (chain->depth && chain->chain_key == chain_key)
-		return;
+free_lock_chain:
 	/* Overwrite the chain key for concurrent RCU readers. */
-	WRITE_ONCE(chain->chain_key, chain_key);
+	WRITE_ONCE(chain->chain_key, INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY);
 	/*
 	 * Note: calling hlist_del_rcu() from inside a
 	 * hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() loop is safe.
 	 */
 	hlist_del_rcu(&chain->entry);
 	__set_bit(chain - lock_chains, pf->lock_chains_being_freed);
-	if (chain->depth == 0)
-		return;
-	/*
-	 * If the modified lock chain matches an existing lock chain, drop
-	 * the modified lock chain.
-	 */
-	if (lookup_chain_cache(chain_key))
-		return;
-	new_chain = alloc_lock_chain();
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_chain)) {
-		debug_locks_off();
-		return;
-	}
-	*new_chain = *chain;
-	hlist_add_head_rcu(&new_chain->entry, chainhashentry(chain_key));
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
index a31d16fd3c43..b6ec9595ae88 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -128,14 +128,15 @@ extern unsigned long nr_zapped_classes;
 extern unsigned long nr_list_entries;
 long lockdep_next_lockchain(long i);
 unsigned long lock_chain_count(void);
-extern int nr_chain_hlocks;
 extern unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
 
 extern unsigned int nr_hardirq_chains;
 extern unsigned int nr_softirq_chains;
 extern unsigned int nr_process_chains;
-extern unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
+extern unsigned int nr_chain_hlocks;
+extern unsigned int nr_leaked_chain_hlocks;
 
+extern unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
 extern unsigned int max_bfs_queue_depth;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 82579fd7469f..aab524530115 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 	seq_printf(m, " dependency chains:             %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
 			lock_chain_count(), MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
-	seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks:       %11d [max: %lu]\n",
+	seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks:       %11u [max: %lu]\n",
 			nr_chain_hlocks, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS);
 #endif
 
@@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	seq_printf(m, " zapped classes:                %11lu\n",
 			nr_zapped_classes);
+	seq_printf(m, " leaked chain hlocks:           %11u\n",
+			nr_leaked_chain_hlocks);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12 22:35 [PATCH 0/5] locking/lockdep: Reuse zapped chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped classes Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped lock chains Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] locking/lockdep: Reuse free chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2019-12-13 10:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 10:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 16:02       ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 16:05         ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 18:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]           ` <7ca26a9a-003f-6f24-08e4-f01b80e3e962@redhat.com>
2019-12-13 18:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 20:08               ` Waiman Long
2019-12-15 17:06                 ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 15:02     ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 18:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191212223525.1652-3-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox