public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] locking/lockdep: Reuse free chain_hlocks entries
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:50:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213105042.GJ2871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213102525.GA2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:25:25AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> void push_block(struct chain_block **bp, struct chain_block *b)
> {
> 	b->next = *bp;
> 	*bp = b;
> }
> 
> /* could contemplate ilog2() buckets */
> int size2bucket(int size)
> {
> 	return size >= MAX_BUCKET ? 0 : size;
> }

If you make the allocation granularity 4 entries, then you can have
push_block() store the chain_block * at the start of every free entry,
which would enable merging adjecent blocks.

That is, if I'm not mistaken these u16 chain entries encode the class
index (per lock_chain_get_class()). And since the lock_classes array is
MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS, or 13 bits, big, we have the MSB of each entry spare.

union {
	struct {
		u16 hlock[4];
	}
	u64 addr;
} ponies;

So if we make the rule that:

	!(idx % 4) && (((union ponies *)chain_hlock[idx])->addr & BIT_ULL(63))

encodes a free block at said addr, then we should be able to detect if:

	chain_hlock[b->base + b->size]

is also free and merge the blocks.

(we just have to fix up the MSB of the address, not all arches have
negative addresses for kernel space)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-13 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12 22:35 [PATCH 0/5] locking/lockdep: Reuse zapped chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped classes Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] locking/lockdep: Track leaked chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped lock chains Waiman Long
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] locking/lockdep: Reuse free chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2019-12-13 10:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 10:50     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-13 16:02       ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 16:05         ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 18:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]           ` <7ca26a9a-003f-6f24-08e4-f01b80e3e962@redhat.com>
2019-12-13 18:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 20:08               ` Waiman Long
2019-12-15 17:06                 ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 15:02     ` Waiman Long
2019-12-13 18:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191213105042.GJ2871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox