From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com,
jbaron@akamai.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com,
hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/17] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624154156.901374384@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200624153024.794671356@infradead.org
Now that notifiers got unbroken; use the proper interface to handle
notifier errors and propagate them.
There were already MODULE_STATE_COMING notifiers that failed; notably:
- jump_label_module_notifier()
- tracepoint_module_notify()
- bpf_event_notify()
By propagating this error, we fix those users.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
kernel/module.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -3751,9 +3751,13 @@ static int prepare_coming_module(struct
if (err)
return err;
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
- MODULE_STATE_COMING, mod);
- return 0;
+ err = blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust(&module_notify_list,
+ MODULE_STATE_COMING, MODULE_STATE_GOING, mod);
+ err = notifier_to_errno(err);
+ if (err)
+ klp_module_going(mod);
+
+ return err;
}
static int unknown_module_param_cb(char *param, char *val, const char *modname,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 15:30 [PATCH v5 00/17] Add static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] jump_label,module: Fix module lifetime for __jump_label_mod_text_reserved Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] static_call: Add inline " Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] static_call: Simple self-test Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate RET Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] static_call: Add static_call_cond() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] static_call: Handle tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] static_call: Allow early init Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 8:58 ` [PATCH v5.1 " Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] x86/perf, static_call: Optimize x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] Add static_call() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624154156.901374384@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox