From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/19] rcu: Point to documentation of ordering guarantees
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:52:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511225304.2893154-14-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511225241.GA2893003@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Add comments to synchronize_rcu() and friends that point to
Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 3 +++
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index e26547b34ad3..f8340c3b1c00 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -1000,6 +1000,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu_expedited);
* synchronize_srcu(), srcu_read_lock(), and srcu_read_unlock() are
* passed the same srcu_struct structure.
*
+ * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is similar to
+ * that of synchronize_rcu().
+ *
* If SRCU is likely idle, expedite the first request. This semantic
* was provided by Classic SRCU, and is relied upon by its users, so TREE
* SRCU must also provide it. Note that detecting idleness is heuristic
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6eb64e44bdcd..2437960a2795 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3084,6 +3084,9 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
* between the call to call_rcu() and the invocation of "func()" -- even
* if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but again only if the system has
* more than one CPU).
+ *
+ * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is described here:
+ * Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
*/
void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
{
@@ -3751,6 +3754,9 @@ static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
* to have executed a full memory barrier during the execution of
* synchronize_rcu() -- even if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but
* again only if the system has more than one CPU).
+ *
+ * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is described here:
+ * Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
*/
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
@@ -3821,7 +3827,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_rcu);
/**
* poll_state_synchronize_rcu - Conditionally wait for an RCU grace period
*
- * @oldstate: return from call to get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu()
+ * @oldstate: value from get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu()
*
* If a full RCU grace period has elapsed since the earlier call from
* which oldstate was obtained, return @true, otherwise return @false.
@@ -3837,6 +3843,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_rcu);
* (many hours even on 32-bit systems) should check them occasionally
* and either refresh them or set a flag indicating that the grace period
* has completed.
+ *
+ * This function provides the same memory-ordering guarantees that
+ * would be provided by a synchronize_rcu() that was invoked at the call
+ * to the function that provided @oldstate, and that returned at the end
+ * of this function.
*/
bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
{
@@ -3851,7 +3862,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_rcu);
/**
* cond_synchronize_rcu - Conditionally wait for an RCU grace period
*
- * @oldstate: return value from earlier call to get_state_synchronize_rcu()
+ * @oldstate: value from get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu()
*
* If a full RCU grace period has elapsed since the earlier call to
* get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu(), just return.
@@ -3861,6 +3872,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_rcu);
* counter wrap is harmless. If the counter wraps, we have waited for
* more than 2 billion grace periods (and way more on a 64-bit system!),
* so waiting for one additional grace period should be just fine.
+ *
+ * This function provides the same memory-ordering guarantees that
+ * would be provided by a synchronize_rcu() that was invoked at the call
+ * to the function that provided @oldstate, and that returned at the end
+ * of this function.
*/
void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
{
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 22:52 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/19] Miscellaneous fixes for v5.14 Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/19] rcu: Fix typo in comment: kthead -> kthread Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/19] rcu: Remove the unused rcu_irq_exit_preempt() function Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/19] rcu: Improve tree.c comments and add code cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/19] rcu: Invoke rcu_spawn_core_kthreads() from rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/19] rcu: Add ->rt_priority and ->gp_start to show_rcu_gp_kthreads() output Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/19] rcu: Add ->gp_max " Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/19] lockdep: Explicitly flag likely false-positive report Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/19] rcu: Reject RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() false positives Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/19] rcu: Add quiescent states and boost states to show_rcu_gp_kthreads() output Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/19] rcu: Make RCU priority boosting work on single-CPU rcu_node structures Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/19] rcu: Make show_rcu_gp_kthreads() dump rcu_node structures blocking GP Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/19] rcu: Restrict RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD to at most four CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/19] rcu: Make rcu_gp_cleanup() be noinline for tracing Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/19] rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/19] sched/isolation: reconcile rcu_nocbs= and nohz_full= Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/19] rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side critical sections Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/19] rcu: Remove obsolete rcu_read_unlock() deadlock commentary Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/19] rcu: Add missing __releases() annotation Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511225304.2893154-14-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox