public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/19] rcu: Remove the unused rcu_irq_exit_preempt() function
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:52:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511225304.2893154-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511225241.GA2893003@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

Commit 9ee01e0f69a9 ("x86/entry: Clean up idtentry_enter/exit()
leftovers") left the rcu_irq_exit_preempt() in place in order to avoid
conflicts with the -rcu tree.  Now that this change has long since hit
mainline, this commit removes the no-longer-used rcu_irq_exit_preempt()
function.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcutiny.h |  1 -
 include/linux/rcutree.h |  1 -
 kernel/rcu/tree.c       | 22 ----------------------
 3 files changed, 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 35e0be326ffc..953e70fafe38 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static inline void rcu_irq_enter(void) { }
 static inline void rcu_irq_exit_irqson(void) { }
 static inline void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) { }
 static inline void rcu_irq_exit(void) { }
-static inline void rcu_irq_exit_preempt(void) { }
 static inline void rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt(void) { }
 #define rcu_is_idle_cpu(cpu) \
 	(is_idle_task(current) && !in_nmi() && !in_irq() && !in_serving_softirq())
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index b89b54130f49..53209d669400 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ void rcu_idle_enter(void);
 void rcu_idle_exit(void);
 void rcu_irq_enter(void);
 void rcu_irq_exit(void);
-void rcu_irq_exit_preempt(void);
 void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void);
 void rcu_irq_exit_irqson(void);
 bool rcu_is_idle_cpu(int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8e78b2430c16..f6543b8004c0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -833,28 +833,6 @@ void noinstr rcu_irq_exit(void)
 	rcu_nmi_exit();
 }
 
-/**
- * rcu_irq_exit_preempt - Inform RCU that current CPU is exiting irq
- *			  towards in kernel preemption
- *
- * Same as rcu_irq_exit() but has a sanity check that scheduling is safe
- * from RCU point of view. Invoked from return from interrupt before kernel
- * preemption.
- */
-void rcu_irq_exit_preempt(void)
-{
-	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-	rcu_nmi_exit();
-
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.dynticks_nesting) <= 0,
-			 "RCU dynticks_nesting counter underflow/zero!");
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.dynticks_nmi_nesting) !=
-			 DYNTICK_IRQ_NONIDLE,
-			 "Bad RCU  dynticks_nmi_nesting counter\n");
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(),
-			 "RCU in extended quiescent state!");
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
 /**
  * rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt - Validate that scheduling is possible
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 22:52 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/19] Miscellaneous fixes for v5.14 Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/19] rcu: Fix typo in comment: kthead -> kthread Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/19] rcu: Improve tree.c comments and add code cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/19] rcu: Invoke rcu_spawn_core_kthreads() from rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/19] rcu: Add ->rt_priority and ->gp_start to show_rcu_gp_kthreads() output Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/19] rcu: Add ->gp_max " Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/19] lockdep: Explicitly flag likely false-positive report Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/19] rcu: Reject RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() false positives Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/19] rcu: Add quiescent states and boost states to show_rcu_gp_kthreads() output Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/19] rcu: Make RCU priority boosting work on single-CPU rcu_node structures Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/19] rcu: Make show_rcu_gp_kthreads() dump rcu_node structures blocking GP Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/19] rcu: Restrict RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD to at most four CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/19] rcu: Make rcu_gp_cleanup() be noinline for tracing Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/19] rcu: Point to documentation of ordering guarantees Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/19] rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/19] sched/isolation: reconcile rcu_nocbs= and nohz_full= Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/19] rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side critical sections Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/19] rcu: Remove obsolete rcu_read_unlock() deadlock commentary Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/19] rcu: Add missing __releases() annotation Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511225304.2893154-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox