From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mikhail Petrov <Mikhail.Petrov@mir.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marty Faltesek <mfaltesek@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kallsyms: fix nonconverging kallsyms table with lld
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 04:47:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621114752.GA116119@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2LTXme3pa-es=7s7aHX2EvC+2Dxegs=reuJrjeS4sygg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:05 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > I thought I'd see the added symbols, but it looks like the only difference
> > > > between the two files is the addresses.
> > > >
> > > > What am I missing ?
> > >
> > > I probably misremembered the part about 'objdump --syms' and there was
> > > something more to it.
> > >
> > > Maybe this was the last version before converging? It looks like the '<' version
> > > has one extra symbol ompared to the '>' version. The diff has no context, but I
> >
> > It is the difference between step 1 and 2. Why would diff on objdump not
> > show the additional symbol ? Is it possible that the symbol is not added
> > to the object file ?
>
> Note sure. The symbol must be in the object file, but perhaps the
> 'objdump --syms' output skips a different set of symbols compared
> to the list that is used as input for kallsyms, which comes from '${NM}'.
>
> Comparing the nm output might be another thing to try.
>
Just following up on this: As Murphy would have told us, the problem
disappeared while trying to track it down. We'll add some instrumentation
into the ChromeOS kernel build to get data once/if/when it shows up again.
When that happens, we'll try to come up with a patch to show the symbol
file differences in the kernel build and submit it upstream.
Thanks,
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 15:29 [PATCH] kallsyms: fix nonconverging kallsyms table with lld Arnd Bergmann
2021-02-05 8:41 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-06-09 11:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-09 11:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-09 15:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-09 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-09 19:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-09 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-10 12:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-10 12:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21 11:47 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210621114752.GA116119@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Mikhail.Petrov@mir.dev \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mfaltesek@google.com \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox