From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86: Use rw_semaphore for APICv lock to allow vCPU parallelism
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:49:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211022004927.1448382-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211022004927.1448382-1-seanjc@google.com>
Use a rw_semaphore instead of a mutex to coordinate APICv updates so that
vCPUs responding to requests can take the lock for read and run in
parallel. Using a mutex forces serialization of vCPUs even though
kvm_vcpu_update_apicv() only touches data local to that vCPU or is
protected by a different lock, e.g. SVM's ir_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 +++++++-----
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f64eef86391d..b61c03cda2b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
atomic_t apic_map_dirty;
/* Protects apic_access_memslot_enabled and apicv_inhibit_reasons */
- struct mutex apicv_update_lock;
+ struct rw_semaphore apicv_update_lock;
bool apic_access_memslot_enabled;
unsigned long apicv_inhibit_reasons;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index 6f11cda2bfa4..4f15c0165c05 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void synic_update_vector(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
if (!!auto_eoi_old == !!auto_eoi_new)
return;
- mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ down_write(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
if (auto_eoi_new)
hv->synic_auto_eoi_used++;
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void synic_update_vector(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
!hv->synic_auto_eoi_used,
APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV);
- mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ up_write(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
}
static int synic_set_sint(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic, int sint,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 03103b69e8a6..77f6dc3aa4ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8742,7 +8742,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_apicv_activated);
static void kvm_apicv_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- mutex_init(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
if (enable_apicv)
clear_bit(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLE,
@@ -9402,7 +9402,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_update_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
return;
- mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ down_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
activate = kvm_apicv_activated(vcpu->kvm);
if (apic->apicv_active == activate)
@@ -9422,7 +9422,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_update_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
out:
- mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ up_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_update_apicv);
@@ -9430,6 +9430,8 @@ void __kvm_request_apicv_update(struct kvm *kvm, bool activate, ulong bit)
{
unsigned long old, new;
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+
if (!kvm_x86_ops.check_apicv_inhibit_reasons ||
!static_call(kvm_x86_check_apicv_inhibit_reasons)(bit))
return;
@@ -9468,9 +9470,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_request_apicv_update);
void kvm_request_apicv_update(struct kvm *kvm, bool activate, ulong bit)
{
- mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ down_write(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
__kvm_request_apicv_update(kvm, activate, bit);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
+ up_write(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_request_apicv_update);
--
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-22 0:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: APICv cleanups Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use vCPU's APICv status when handling APIC_ACCESS memslot Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: Move SVM's APICv sanity check to common x86 Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86: Move apicv_active flag from vCPU to in-kernel local APIC Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-10-22 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: APICv cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-22 14:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-22 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-25 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-25 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-25 15:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-25 16:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211022004927.1448382-5-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox