From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: APICv cleanups
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:43:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b931906f-b38e-1cb5-c797-65ef82c8b262@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c159d2f23dc3957a2fda0301b25fca67aa21b30.camel@redhat.com>
On 22/10/21 16:56, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> vCPU0 vCPU1
> ===== =====
>
> - disable AVIC
> - #NPT on AVIC MMIO access
vCPU1 is now OUTSIDE_GUEST_CODE
> -*stuck on something prior to the page fault code*
> - enable AVIC
> -*still stuck on something prior to the page fault code*
> - disable AVIC:
> - raise KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE request
kvm_make_all_cpus_request does not wait for vCPU1
> - zap the SPTE (does nothing, doesn't race
> with anything either)
vCPU0 writes mmu_notifier_seq here
> - now vCPU1 finally starts running the page fault code.
vCPU1 reads mmu_notifier_seq here
So yeah, I think you're right.
The VM value doesn't have this problem, because it is always stored
before mmu_notifier_seq is incremented (on the write side) and loaded
after the mmu_notifier_seq (on the page fault side). Therefore, if
vCPU1 sees a stale per-VM apicv_active flag, it is always going to see a
stale mmu_notifier_seq.
With the per-vCPU flag, instead, the flag is written by
kvm_vcpu_update_apicv, and that can be long after mmu_notifier_seq is
incremented.
Paolo
> - vCPU1 AVIC is still enabled
> (because vCPU1 never handled KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE),
> so the page fault code will populate the SPTE.
>
> - handle KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE
> - finally disable vCPU1 AVIC
>
> - VMRUN (vCPU1 AVIC disabled, SPTE populated)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-22 0:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: APICv cleanups Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use vCPU's APICv status when handling APIC_ACCESS memslot Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: Move SVM's APICv sanity check to common x86 Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86: Move apicv_active flag from vCPU to in-kernel local APIC Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86: Use rw_semaphore for APICv lock to allow vCPU parallelism Sean Christopherson
2021-10-22 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: APICv cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-22 14:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-22 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-10-25 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-25 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-25 15:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-25 16:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b931906f-b38e-1cb5-c797-65ef82c8b262@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox