public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2] random: move initialization out of reseeding hot path
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:05:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220513120543.314127-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pN_N_fG6k5gFB8mwrEPn1W-Zy54AmA3VSSvrkQyc3PvA@mail.gmail.com>

Initialization happens once -- by way of credit_init_bits() -- and then
it never happens again. Therefore, it doesn't need to be in
crng_reseed(), which is a hot path that is called multiple times. It
also doesn't make sense to have there, as initialization activity is
better associated with initialization routines.

After the prior commit, crng_reseed() now won't be called by multiple
concurrent callers, which means that we can safely move the
"finialize_init" logic into crng_init_bits() unconditionally.

Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Changes v1->v2:
- Keep crng_init = CRNG_READY conditional to avoid dirtying cache line.

 drivers/char/random.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 3646eac353b7..8cea19024936 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ static void crng_reseed(void)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long next_gen;
 	u8 key[CHACHA_KEY_SIZE];
-	bool finalize_init = false;
 
 	extract_entropy(key, sizeof(key));
 
@@ -282,28 +281,10 @@ static void crng_reseed(void)
 		++next_gen;
 	WRITE_ONCE(base_crng.generation, next_gen);
 	WRITE_ONCE(base_crng.birth, jiffies);
-	if (!crng_ready()) {
+	if (!crng_ready())
 		crng_init = CRNG_READY;
-		finalize_init = true;
-	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base_crng.lock, flags);
 	memzero_explicit(key, sizeof(key));
-	if (finalize_init) {
-		process_random_ready_list();
-		wake_up_interruptible(&crng_init_wait);
-		kill_fasync(&fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
-		pr_notice("crng init done\n");
-		if (unseeded_warning.missed) {
-			pr_notice("%d get_random_xx warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting\n",
-				  unseeded_warning.missed);
-			unseeded_warning.missed = 0;
-		}
-		if (urandom_warning.missed) {
-			pr_notice("%d urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting\n",
-				  urandom_warning.missed);
-			urandom_warning.missed = 0;
-		}
-	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -835,10 +816,25 @@ static void credit_init_bits(size_t nbits)
 		new = min_t(unsigned int, POOL_BITS, orig + add);
 	} while (cmpxchg(&input_pool.init_bits, orig, new) != orig);
 
-	if (orig < POOL_READY_BITS && new >= POOL_READY_BITS)
-		crng_reseed();
-	else if (orig < POOL_EARLY_BITS && new >= POOL_EARLY_BITS) {
+	if (orig < POOL_READY_BITS && new >= POOL_READY_BITS) {
+		crng_reseed(); /* Sets crng_init to CRNG_READY under base_crng.lock. */
+		process_random_ready_list();
+		wake_up_interruptible(&crng_init_wait);
+		kill_fasync(&fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+		pr_notice("crng init done\n");
+		if (unseeded_warning.missed) {
+			pr_notice("%d get_random_xx warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting\n",
+				  unseeded_warning.missed);
+			unseeded_warning.missed = 0;
+		}
+		if (urandom_warning.missed) {
+			pr_notice("%d urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting\n",
+				  urandom_warning.missed);
+			urandom_warning.missed = 0;
+		}
+	} else if (orig < POOL_EARLY_BITS && new >= POOL_EARLY_BITS) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&base_crng.lock, flags);
+		/* Check if crng_init is CRNG_EMPTY, to avoid race with crng_reseed(). */
 		if (crng_init == CRNG_EMPTY) {
 			extract_entropy(base_crng.key, sizeof(base_crng.key));
 			crng_init = CRNG_EARLY;
-- 
2.35.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09 12:14 [PATCH 1/2] random: avoid init'ing twice in credit race Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] random: move initialization out of reseeding hot path Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-13  6:24   ` Dominik Brodowski
2022-05-13 10:21     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-13 11:38       ` David Laight
2022-05-13 12:02         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-13 12:05           ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-05-13  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] random: avoid init'ing twice in credit race Dominik Brodowski
2022-05-13 10:23   ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220513120543.314127-1-Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox