public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller
Date: Wed,  6 Jul 2022 10:55:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706025524.2904370-10-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706025524.2904370-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into dmar_remove_one_dev_info() which
is its only caller. Make the spin lock critical range only cover the
device list change code and remove some unnecessary checks.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index a94fb69e1f9a..899ae63e1ddf 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
 static int g_num_of_iommus;
 
 static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev);
-static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info);
 
 int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
 int intel_iommu_sm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON);
@@ -4137,20 +4136,12 @@ static void domain_context_clear(struct device_domain_info *info)
 			       &domain_context_clear_one_cb, info);
 }
 
-static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
+static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct dmar_domain *domain;
-	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
-	if (WARN_ON(!info))
-		return;
-
-	iommu = info->iommu;
-	domain = info->domain;
+	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
 
-	if (info->dev && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
+	if (!dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
 		if (dev_is_pci(info->dev) && sm_supported(iommu))
 			intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, info->dev,
 					PASID_RID2PASID, false);
@@ -4160,19 +4151,11 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 		intel_pasid_free_table(info->dev);
 	}
 
-	list_del(&info->link);
-	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-}
-
-static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct device_domain_info *info;
-
 	spin_lock(&device_domain_lock);
-	info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
-	if (info)
-		__dmar_remove_one_dev_info(info);
+	list_del(&info->link);
 	spin_unlock(&device_domain_lock);
+
+	domain_detach_iommu(info->domain, iommu);
 }
 
 static int md_domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-06  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-06  2:55 [PATCH v4 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
     [not found]   ` <849557ab-9c1b-a2ff-6fc6-6564f38d1187@linux.intel.com>
2022-07-07  9:18     ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-07-07  3:03   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-07-06  2:55 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain lock Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220706025524.2904370-10-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox