From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:55:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706025524.2904370-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706025524.2904370-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The iommu->lock is used to protect the per-IOMMU domain ID resource.
Moving the lock into the ID alloc/free helpers makes the code more
compact. At the same time, the device_domain_lock is irrelevant to
the domain ID resource, remove its assertion as well.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 93f01082dce1..7f03576e72d7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1779,16 +1779,13 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(unsigned int type)
return domain;
}
-/* Must be called with iommu->lock */
static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
struct intel_iommu *iommu)
{
unsigned long ndomains;
- int num;
-
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
- assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
+ int num, ret = 0;
+ spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] += 1;
if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 1) {
ndomains = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
@@ -1797,7 +1794,8 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
if (num >= ndomains) {
pr_err("%s: No free domain ids\n", iommu->name);
domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
- return -ENOSPC;
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
set_bit(num, iommu->domain_ids);
@@ -1806,7 +1804,9 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
}
- return 0;
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+ return ret;
}
static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
@@ -1814,9 +1814,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
{
int num;
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
- assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
-
+ spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 0) {
num = domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
@@ -1824,6 +1822,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id] = 0;
}
+ spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
}
static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int gaw)
@@ -2472,9 +2471,7 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
spin_lock(&device_domain_lock);
info->domain = domain;
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
if (ret) {
spin_unlock(&device_domain_lock);
return ret;
@@ -4178,10 +4175,7 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
}
list_del(&info->link);
-
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
}
static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 2:55 [PATCH v4 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
[not found] ` <849557ab-9c1b-a2ff-6fc6-6564f38d1187@linux.intel.com>
2022-07-07 9:18 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-07-07 3:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-07-06 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain lock Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220706025524.2904370-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox