* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-11-14 17:52 ` Jon Hunter
2022-11-14 18:35 ` Pavel Machek
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-11-14 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:44:54 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.155-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.155-rc1-gd59f46a55fcd
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-11-14 17:52 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-11-14 18:35 ` Pavel Machek
2022-11-14 20:20 ` Shuah Khan
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2022-11-14 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-11-14 17:52 ` Jon Hunter
2022-11-14 18:35 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2022-11-14 20:20 ` Shuah Khan
2022-11-14 21:06 ` Slade Watkins
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-11-14 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 11/14/22 05:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.155-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-14 20:20 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-11-14 21:06 ` Slade Watkins
2022-11-14 21:44 ` Florian Fainelli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Slade Watkins @ 2022-11-14 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 7:47 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
5.10.155-rc1 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors
or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
All the best,
-srw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-14 21:06 ` Slade Watkins
@ 2022-11-14 21:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-11-15 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-11-14 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 11/14/22 04:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.155-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-14 21:44 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-11-15 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-11-15 10:50 ` Sudip Mukherjee
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-11-15 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:44:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-15 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-11-15 10:50 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-11-15 10:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-11-15 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:44:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221016):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2161
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2162
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-15 10:50 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2022-11-15 10:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-11-15 11:49 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-11-16 1:44 ` zhouzhixiu
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-11-15 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 18:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.155-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.155-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: d59f46a55fcdeaab7337522c1c89553399bd1648
* git describe: v5.10.154-96-gd59f46a55fcd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.154-96-gd59f46a55fcd
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.154)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.154)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.154)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.154)
## Test result summary
total: 56790, pass: 49368, fail: 1048, skip: 6172, xfail: 202
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 292 total, 290 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 80 total, 77 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 74 total, 70 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 54 total, 54 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 56 total, 46 passed, 10 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 78 total, 74 passed, 4 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-timens
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-15 10:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-11-15 11:49 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-11-16 1:44 ` zhouzhixiu
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rudi Heitbaum @ 2022-11-15 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:44:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.10.155-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review
2022-11-14 12:44 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.155-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-15 11:49 ` Rudi Heitbaum
@ 2022-11-16 1:44 ` zhouzhixiu
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: zhouzhixiu @ 2022-11-16 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2022/11/14 20:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.155 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:44:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.155-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.155-rc1,
Kernel
repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.155-rc1
Commit: d59f46a55fcdeaab7337522c1c89553399bd1648
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread