public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: davinci: Do not mention legacy API in the code
@ 2023-01-12 13:46 Andy Shevchenko
  2023-01-13 15:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-01-12 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartosz Golaszewski, Devarsh Thakkar, Christophe Leroy,
	linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: Keerthy, Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Andy Shevchenko

Replace mentioning of legacy API by the latest one.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index fa51a91afa54..e1c1b9a527db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Arrange gpio_to_irq() support, handling either direct IRQs or
+	 * Arrange gpiod_to_irq() support, handling either direct IRQs or
 	 * banked IRQs.  Having GPIOs in the first GPIO bank use direct
 	 * IRQs, while the others use banked IRQs, would need some setup
 	 * tweaks to recognize hardware which can do that.
-- 
2.39.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: davinci: Do not mention legacy API in the code
  2023-01-12 13:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: davinci: Do not mention legacy API in the code Andy Shevchenko
@ 2023-01-13 15:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2023-01-13 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, Devarsh Thakkar, Christophe Leroy,
	linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Keerthy, Linus Walleij

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:46 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Replace mentioning of legacy API by the latest one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index fa51a91afa54..e1c1b9a527db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        * Arrange gpio_to_irq() support, handling either direct IRQs or
> +        * Arrange gpiod_to_irq() support, handling either direct IRQs or
>          * banked IRQs.  Having GPIOs in the first GPIO bank use direct
>          * IRQs, while the others use banked IRQs, would need some setup
>          * tweaks to recognize hardware which can do that.
> --
> 2.39.0
>

Applied, thanks!

Bart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-13 15:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-12 13:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: davinci: Do not mention legacy API in the code Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-13 15:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox