[PATCH] regulator: max597x: Remove unused variable

[PATCH] regulator: max597x: Remove unused variable

[Naresh Solanki]

max597x_regmap_config isn't used & hence remove the same.

Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c
index 39f803ff0a90..ab9dc18f98e3 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c
@@ -357,12 +357,6 @@ static int max597x_irq_handler(int irq, struct regulator_irq_data *rid,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct regmap_config max597x_regmap_config = {
-	.reg_bits = 8,
-	.val_bits = 8,
-	.max_register = MAX_REGISTERS,
-};
-
 static int max597x_adc_range(struct regmap *regmap, const int ch,
 			     u32 *irng, u32 *mon_rng)
 {

base-commit: e4b37538f6f7c24a13d6bede4e75f60f213bd2ea
-- 
2.39.1

Re: [PATCH] regulator: max597x: Remove unused variable

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:32:25 +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> max597x_regmap_config isn't used & hence remove the same.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: max597x: Remove unused variable
      commit: 6caacd82f09c183a91951776cd8d326e46ef84b4

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark