public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 07:07:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230211150749.GA202703@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207120241.2800662-2-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:02:39PM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Add function pmbus get status that can be used to get both pmbus
> specific status & regulator status
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> ...
> Changes in V2:
> - Add __maybe_unused attribute for pmbus_get_status function
> - Remove unrelated changes
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index 1b70cf3be313..5ccae8126a56 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> @@ -2735,61 +2735,14 @@ static const struct pmbus_status_category __maybe_unused pmbus_status_flag_map[]
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
> -static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> -	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> -
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
> -}
> -
> -static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
> -{
> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> -	ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
> -				     PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
> -				     enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> -
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> -	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
> -}
> -
> -static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> -	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
> -}
>  
> -static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
> +static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *flags)
>  {
> -	int i, status;
> +	int i, status, ret;
>  	const struct pmbus_status_category *cat;
>  	const struct pmbus_status_assoc *bit;
> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> +	struct device *dev = data->dev;
> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>  	int func = data->info->func[page];
>  
>  	*flags = 0;
> @@ -2827,7 +2780,13 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>  	if (status < 0)
>  		return status;
>  
> -	if (pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) {
> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> +	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	if (ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON) {

This code is now executed twice. Please keep the original function,
just rename it to pmbus_is_enabled() or similar, then call it from
pmbus_regulator_is_enabled() which then just needs to adjust the
parameter (and maybe pass 'dev' as argument).

>  		if (status & PB_STATUS_OFF)
>  			*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>  
> @@ -2855,6 +2814,61 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
> +static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> +	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);

This could then be as simple as

	return pmbus_is_enabled(rdev_get_dev(rdev));

Thanks,
Guenter

> +}
> +
> +static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> +	ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
> +				     PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
> +				     enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +	return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags);
> +}
> +
>  static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-11 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07 12:02 [PATCH v2 1/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Generalize pmbus status flag map Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:07   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2023-02-14 14:10     ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Add interrupt support Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:37   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:10     ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Notify hwmon events Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:46   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:11     ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-14 14:54       ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 15:22         ` Naresh Solanki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230211150749.GA202703@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.solanki@9elements.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox