From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 07:07:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230211150749.GA202703@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207120241.2800662-2-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:02:39PM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Add function pmbus get status that can be used to get both pmbus
> specific status & regulator status
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> ...
> Changes in V2:
> - Add __maybe_unused attribute for pmbus_get_status function
> - Remove unrelated changes
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index 1b70cf3be313..5ccae8126a56 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> @@ -2735,61 +2735,14 @@ static const struct pmbus_status_category __maybe_unused pmbus_status_flag_map[]
> },
> };
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
> -static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> - int ret;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> - ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> -
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
> -}
> -
> -static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> - int ret;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> - ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
> - PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
> - enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> - return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
> -}
> -
> -static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> -{
> - return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
> -}
>
> -static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
> +static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *flags)
> {
> - int i, status;
> + int i, status, ret;
> const struct pmbus_status_category *cat;
> const struct pmbus_status_assoc *bit;
> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> + struct device *dev = data->dev;
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> int func = data->info->func[page];
>
> *flags = 0;
> @@ -2827,7 +2780,13 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
> if (status < 0)
> return status;
>
> - if (pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) {
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + if (ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON) {
This code is now executed twice. Please keep the original function,
just rename it to pmbus_is_enabled() or similar, then call it from
pmbus_regulator_is_enabled() which then just needs to adjust the
parameter (and maybe pass 'dev' as argument).
> if (status & PB_STATUS_OFF)
> *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>
> @@ -2855,6 +2814,61 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
> +static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
This could then be as simple as
return pmbus_is_enabled(rdev_get_dev(rdev));
Thanks,
Guenter
> +}
> +
> +static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
> + PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
> + enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags);
> +}
> +
> static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-11 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 12:02 [PATCH v2 1/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Generalize pmbus status flag map Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:07 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2023-02-14 14:10 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Add interrupt support Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:10 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Notify hwmon events Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:11 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-14 14:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 15:22 ` Naresh Solanki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230211150749.GA202703@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.solanki@9elements.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox