From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Notify hwmon events
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 07:46:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230211154647.GA204954@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207120241.2800662-4-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:02:41PM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
>
> Notify hwmon events using the pmbus irq handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> ...
> Changes in V2
> - Remove __maybe_unsed attribute as its not needed.
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index d5403baad60a..f6778a9c7126 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> @@ -2735,8 +2735,36 @@ static const struct pmbus_status_category __maybe_unused pmbus_status_flag_map[]
> },
> };
>
> +#define to_dev_attr(_dev_attr) \
> + container_of(_dev_attr, struct device_attribute, attr)
> +
> +static void pmbus_notify(struct pmbus_data *data, int page, int reg, int flags)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->num_attributes; i++) {
> + struct device_attribute *da = to_dev_attr(data->group.attrs[i]);
> + struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(da);
> + int index = attr->index;
> + u16 smask = pb_index_to_mask(index);
> + u8 spage = pb_index_to_page(index);
> + u16 sreg = pb_index_to_reg(index);
> +
> + if (reg == sreg && page == spage && (smask & flags)) {
> + dev_dbg(data->dev, "sysfs notify: %s", da->attr.name);
> + sysfs_notify(&data->dev->kobj, NULL, da->attr.name);
> + kobject_uevent(&data->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> + flags &= ~smask;
> + }
> +
> + if (!flags)
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *flags,
> + bool notify)
>
> -static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *flags)
> {
> int i, status, ret;
> const struct pmbus_status_category *cat;
> @@ -2764,6 +2792,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsi
> if (status & bit->pflag)
> *flags |= bit->rflag;
> }
> +
> + if (notify && status)
> + pmbus_notify(data, page, cat->reg, status);
> +
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2866,7 +2898,7 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
> - return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags);
> + return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags, false);
> }
>
> static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> @@ -3108,10 +3140,14 @@ static irqreturn_t pmbus_fault_handler(int irq, void *pdata)
> {
> struct pmbus_data *data = pdata;
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->dev);
> - int i, status;
> + int i, status, ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < data->info->pages; i++) {
> + ret = pmbus_get_flags(data, i, &status, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
You should introduce a locked version of pmbus_get_flags() and call
that function, and keep the existing locking in place.
> status = pmbus_read_status_word(client, i);
> if (status < 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> @@ -3120,8 +3156,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pmbus_fault_handler(int irq, void *pdata)
>
> if (status & ~(PB_STATUS_OFF | PB_STATUS_BUSY | PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N))
> pmbus_clear_fault_page(client, i);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
This would add a second empty line (not that it matters because the code
should not change the locking in the first place).
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-11 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 12:02 [PATCH v2 1/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Generalize pmbus status flag map Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:10 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Add interrupt support Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 14:10 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-07 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Notify hwmon events Naresh Solanki
2023-02-11 15:46 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2023-02-14 14:11 ` Naresh Solanki
2023-02-14 14:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-14 15:22 ` Naresh Solanki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230211154647.GA204954@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.solanki@9elements.com \
--cc=patrick.rudolph@9elements.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox