From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: pru: remove always true check positive unsigned value
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:59:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405165946.GA3812912@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404-pru-always-true-v1-1-b1b55eeff188@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> In both cases they type of da is u32. And PRU_PDRAM_DA is 0.
> So the check da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA is always true and can be removed.
>
> Flagged by Smatch:
>
> drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:660 pru_d_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
> drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:709 pru_i_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
>
> No functional changes intended.
> Compile tested only.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4025983.html
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Applied
Thanks,
Mathieu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> index b76db7fa693d..095f66130f48 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static void *pru_d_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
> swap(dram0, dram1);
> shrd_ram = pruss->mem_regions[PRUSS_MEM_SHRD_RAM2];
>
> - if (da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA && da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
> + if (da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
> offset = da - PRU_PDRAM_DA;
> va = (__force void *)(dram0.va + offset);
> } else if (da >= PRU_SDRAM_DA &&
> @@ -706,8 +706,7 @@ static void *pru_i_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
> */
> da &= 0xfffff;
>
> - if (da >= PRU_IRAM_DA &&
> - da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
> + if (da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
> offset = da - PRU_IRAM_DA;
> va = (__force void *)(pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].va +
> offset);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-04 12:44 [PATCH] remoteproc: pru: remove always true check positive unsigned value Simon Horman
2023-04-04 12:51 ` Mukesh Ojha
2023-04-05 16:59 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230405165946.GA3812912@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox