Re: [RFC PATCH v4] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 09:56:38AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> > Mathieu, WDYT? -- other than that the patch is an obvious hack :-)
> 
> I hate it with passion :-)
> 
> It is quite specific to your workload/configuration.
> 
> If we take for instance a process with a large mm_users count which is
> eventually affined to a subset of the cpus with cpusets or
> sched_setaffinity, your patch will prevent compaction of the concurrency ids
> when it really should not.

I don't think it will, it will only kick in once the higest cid is
handed out (I should've used num_online_cpus() instead of nr_cpu_ids),
and with affinity at play that should never happen.

Now, the more fancy scheme with:

	min(t->nr_cpus_allowed, atomic_read(&t->mm->mm_users))

that does get to be more complex; and I've yet to find a working version
that doesn't also need a for_each_cpu() loop on for reclaim :/

Anyway, I think the hack as presented is safe, but a hack none-the-less.