[GIT PULL] AMDTEE fix for v6.5

[GIT PULL] AMDTEE fix for v6.5

[Jens Wiklander]

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this AMDTEE driver fix to add a return origin field to the
struct tee_cmd_load_ta used when loading a Trusted Application into the
AMDTEE. This change is backward compatible.

Note that this isn't a usual Arm driver update. This targets AMD instead,
but is part of the TEE subsystem.

Thanks,
Jens

The following changes since commit f1fcbaa18b28dec10281551dfe6ed3a3ed80e3d6:

  Linux 6.4-rc2 (2023-05-14 12:51:40 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/amdtee-fix-for-v6.5

for you to fetch changes up to 436eeae0411acdfc54521ddea80ee76d4ae8a7ea:

  tee: amdtee: Add return_origin to 'struct tee_cmd_load_ta' (2023-05-15 08:29:52 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
AMDTEE add return origin to load TA command

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rijo Thomas (1):
      tee: amdtee: Add return_origin to 'struct tee_cmd_load_ta'

 drivers/tee/amdtee/amdtee_if.h | 10 ++++++----
 drivers/tee/amdtee/call.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] AMDTEE fix for v6.5

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 09:58, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hello arm-soc maintainers,
>
> Please pull this AMDTEE driver fix to add a return origin field to the
> struct tee_cmd_load_ta used when loading a Trusted Application into the
> AMDTEE. This change is backward compatible.
>
> Note that this isn't a usual Arm driver update. This targets AMD instead,
> but is part of the TEE subsystem.
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
>
> The following changes since commit f1fcbaa18b28dec10281551dfe6ed3a3ed80e3d6:
>
>   Linux 6.4-rc2 (2023-05-14 12:51:40 -0700)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
>   https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git 
> tags/amdtee-fix-for-v6.5
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 436eeae0411acdfc54521ddea80ee76d4ae8a7ea:

I see there is only one patch here, and it is marked as 'Cc: stable',
so I assume  you meant this to be include in v6.4, not 6.5. Can you
confirm that?

     Arnd

Re: [GIT PULL] AMDTEE fix for v6.5

[Jens Wiklander]

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 09:58, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> >
> > Please pull this AMDTEE driver fix to add a return origin field to the
> > struct tee_cmd_load_ta used when loading a Trusted Application into the
> > AMDTEE. This change is backward compatible.
> >
> > Note that this isn't a usual Arm driver update. This targets AMD instead,
> > but is part of the TEE subsystem.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jens
> >
> > The following changes since commit f1fcbaa18b28dec10281551dfe6ed3a3ed80e3d6:
> >
> >   Linux 6.4-rc2 (2023-05-14 12:51:40 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git
> > tags/amdtee-fix-for-v6.5
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 436eeae0411acdfc54521ddea80ee76d4ae8a7ea:
>
> I see there is only one patch here, and it is marked as 'Cc: stable',
> so I assume  you meant this to be include in v6.4, not 6.5. Can you
> confirm that?

If you don't mind taking it for v6.4 that's even better.

Thanks,
Jens

>
>      Arnd

Re: [GIT PULL] AMDTEE fix for v6.5

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, at 08:53, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 09:58, Jens Wiklander wrote:
>> > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
>> >
>> > Please pull this AMDTEE driver fix to add a return origin field to the
>> > struct tee_cmd_load_ta used when loading a Trusted Application into the
>> > AMDTEE. This change is backward compatible.
>> >
>> > Note that this isn't a usual Arm driver update. This targets AMD instead,
>> > but is part of the TEE subsystem.
>> >
>>
>> I see there is only one patch here, and it is marked as 'Cc: stable',
>> so I assume  you meant this to be include in v6.4, not 6.5. Can you
>> confirm that?
>
> If you don't mind taking it for v6.4 that's even better.

Yes, done that now. 

       Arnd