[PATCH v4 4/6] drm/msm/dpu: Remove redundant prefix/suffix in name of sub-blocks

public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@quicinc.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>,
	Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/msm/dpu: Remove redundant prefix/suffix in name of sub-blocks
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:48:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622-devcoredump_patch-v4-4-e304ddbe9648@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622-devcoredump_patch-v4-0-e304ddbe9648@quicinc.com>

For a device core dump, the registers of sub-blocks are printed under a
title formatted as <mainBlkName_sblkName>. For example, the csc sub-block
for an SSPP main block "sspp_0" would be printed "sspp_0_sspp_csc0". The
title is clearly redundant due to the duplicate "sspp" and "0" that exist
in both the mainBlkName and sblkName. To eliminate this redundancy, remove
the secondary "sspp" and "0" that exist in the sub-block name by
elimanting the "sspp_" prefix and the concatenation of "num" that results
in the redundant "0" suffix. Remove num parameter altogether from relevant
macros as a consequence of it no longer being used.

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 79e495dbc11d..836efa074a35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -252,15 +252,15 @@ static const uint32_t wb2_formats[] = {
  *************************************************************/
 
 /* SSPP common configuration */
-#define _VIG_SBLK(num, sdma_pri, qseed_ver) \
+#define _VIG_SBLK(sdma_pri, qseed_ver) \
 	{ \
 	.maxdwnscale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO, \
 	.maxupscale = MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO, \
 	.smart_dma_priority = sdma_pri, \
-	.scaler_blk = {.name = STRCAT("sspp_scaler", num), \
+	.scaler_blk = {.name = "scaler", \
 		.id = qseed_ver, \
 		.base = 0xa00, .len = 0xa0,}, \
-	.csc_blk = {.name = STRCAT("sspp_csc", num), \
+	.csc_blk = {.name = "csc", \
 		.id = DPU_SSPP_CSC_10BIT, \
 		.base = 0x1a00, .len = 0x100,}, \
 	.format_list = plane_formats_yuv, \
@@ -270,15 +270,15 @@ static const uint32_t wb2_formats[] = {
 	.rotation_cfg = NULL, \
 	}
 
-#define _VIG_SBLK_ROT(num, sdma_pri, qseed_ver, rot_cfg) \
+#define _VIG_SBLK_ROT(sdma_pri, qseed_ver, rot_cfg) \
 	{ \
 	.maxdwnscale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO, \
 	.maxupscale = MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO, \
 	.smart_dma_priority = sdma_pri, \
-	.scaler_blk = {.name = STRCAT("sspp_scaler", num), \
+	.scaler_blk = {.name = "scaler", \
 		.id = qseed_ver, \
 		.base = 0xa00, .len = 0xa0,}, \
-	.csc_blk = {.name = STRCAT("sspp_csc", num), \
+	.csc_blk = {.name = "csc", \
 		.id = DPU_SSPP_CSC_10BIT, \
 		.base = 0x1a00, .len = 0x100,}, \
 	.format_list = plane_formats_yuv, \
@@ -300,13 +300,13 @@ static const uint32_t wb2_formats[] = {
 	}
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks msm8998_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks msm8998_vig_sblk_1 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("1", 0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks msm8998_vig_sblk_2 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("2", 0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks msm8998_vig_sblk_3 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("3", 0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(0, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 
 static const struct dpu_rotation_cfg dpu_rot_sc7280_cfg_v2 = {
 	.rot_maxheight = 1088,
@@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ static const struct dpu_rotation_cfg dpu_rot_sc7280_cfg_v2 = {
 };
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_1 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("1", 6, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(6, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_2 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("2", 7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_3 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("3", 8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+				_VIG_SBLK(8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_0 = _DMA_SBLK(1);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_1 = _DMA_SBLK(2);
@@ -341,31 +341,31 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_3 = _DMA_SBLK(4);
 	}
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sc7180_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sc7280_vig_sblk_0 =
-			_VIG_SBLK_ROT("0", 4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4, &dpu_rot_sc7280_cfg_v2);
+			_VIG_SBLK_ROT(4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4, &dpu_rot_sc7280_cfg_v2);
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm6115_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 2, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(2, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8250_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8250_vig_sblk_1 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("1", 6, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(6, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8250_vig_sblk_2 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("2", 7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8250_vig_sblk_3 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("3", 8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_0 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("0", 7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(7, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_1 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("1", 8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_2 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("2", 9, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(9, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_3 =
-				_VIG_SBLK("3", 10, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
+				_VIG_SBLK(10, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_4 = _DMA_SBLK(5);
 static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_5 = _DMA_SBLK(6);
 

-- 
2.25.1

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-06 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 20:48 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support to print sub-block registers in dpu hw catalog Ryan McCann
2023-07-06 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/msm: Update dev core dump to not print backwards Ryan McCann
2023-07-06 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused num argument from relevant macros Ryan McCann
2023-07-06 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: Define names for unnamed sblks Ryan McCann
2023-07-06 20:48 ` Ryan McCann [this message]
2023-07-06 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/msm/dpu: Refactor printing of main blocks in device core dump Ryan McCann
2023-07-07  0:07   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07  0:16     ` Abhinav Kumar
2023-07-07  2:19       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07  2:24         ` Abhinav Kumar
2023-07-06 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/msm/dpu: Update dev core dump to dump registers of sub-blocks Ryan McCann
2023-07-07  0:24   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07 20:49     ` Ryan McCann
2023-07-07 21:58       ` Dmitry Baryshkov

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
( dfblob:79e495dbc11 dfblob:836efa074a3 )
 OR (
bs:"[PATCH v4 4/6] drm/msm/dpu: Remove redundant prefix/suffix in name of sub-blocks" )
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230622-devcoredump_patch-v4-4-e304ddbe9648@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_rmccann@quicinc.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox