* [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Reduce cost of accessing tg->load_avg @ 2023-08-16 2:48 Aaron Lu 2023-08-16 2:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg Aaron Lu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-16 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra, Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli Cc: Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel Nitin Tekchandani noticed some scheduler functions have high cost according to perf/cycles while running postgres_sysbench workload. I perf/annotated the high cost functions: update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() and found the costs were ~90% due to accessing to tg->load_avg. This series is an attempt to reduce the overhead of the two functions. Thanks to Vincent's suggestion from v1, this revision used a simpler way to solve the overhead problem by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once per ms. Benchmark shows that it has good results and with the rate limit in place, other optimizations in v1 don't improve performance further so they are dropped from this revision. Aaron Lu (1): sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-16 2:48 [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Reduce cost of accessing tg->load_avg Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-16 2:48 ` Aaron Lu 2023-08-16 4:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy 2023-08-17 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-16 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra, Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli Cc: Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change involves an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. ============================== postgres_sysbench on SPR: 25% base: 42382±19.8% patch: 50174±9.5% (noise) 50% base: 67626±1.3% patch: 67365±3.1% (noise) 75% base: 100216±1.2% patch: 112470±0.1% +12.2% 100% base: 93671±0.4% patch: 113563±0.2% +21.2% ============================== hackbench on ICL: group=1 base: 114912±5.2% patch: 117857±2.5% (noise) group=4 base: 359902±1.6% patch: 361685±2.7% (noise) group=8 base: 461070±0.8% patch: 491713±0.3% +6.6% group=16 base: 309032±5.0% patch: 378337±1.3% +22.4% ============================= hackbench on SPR: group=1 base: 100768±2.9% patch: 103134±2.9% (noise) group=4 base: 413830±12.5% patch: 378660±16.6% (noise) group=8 base: 436124±0.6% patch: 490787±3.2% +12.5% group=16 base: 457730±3.2% patch: 680452±1.3% +48.8% ============================ netperf/udp_rr on ICL 25% base: 114413±0.1% patch: 115111±0.0% +0.6% 50% base: 86803±0.5% patch: 86611±0.0% (noise) 75% base: 35959±5.3% patch: 49801±0.6% +38.5% 100% base: 61951±6.4% patch: 70224±0.8% +13.4% =========================== netperf/udp_rr on SPR 25% base: 104954±1.3% patch: 107312±2.8% (noise) 50% base: 55394±4.6% patch: 54940±7.4% (noise) 75% base: 13779±3.1% patch: 36105±1.1% +162% 100% base: 9703±3.7% patch: 28011±0.2% +189% ============================================== netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range) 25% base: 43092±0.1% patch: 42891±0.5% 50% base: 19278±14.9% patch: 22369±7.2% 75% base: 16822±3.0% patch: 17086±2.3% 100% base: 18216±0.6% patch: 18078±2.9% =============================================== netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range) 25% base: 34491±0.3% patch: 34886±0.5% 50% base: 19278±14.9% patch: 22369±7.2% 75% base: 16822±3.0% patch: 17086±2.3% 100% base: 18216±0.6% patch: 18078±2.9% Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 6e79de26a25d..ab055c72cc64 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3664,7 +3664,8 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) */ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { - long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; + long delta; + u64 now; /* * No need to update load_avg for root_task_group as it is not used. @@ -3672,9 +3673,19 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group) return; + /* + * For migration heavy workload, access to tg->load_avg can be + * unbound. Limit the update rate to at most once per ms. + */ + now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))); + if (now - cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg < NSEC_PER_MSEC) + return; + + delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) { atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg); cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg; + cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg = now; } } diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 19af1766df2d..228a298bf3b5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; long propagate; long prop_runnable_sum; -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-16 2:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-16 4:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy 2023-08-16 5:55 ` Aaron Lu 2023-08-17 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Gautham R. Shenoy @ 2023-08-16 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Lu Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel, David Vernet Hello Aaron, (Adding David Vernet) On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:48:31AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance > with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times > update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on > a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): > > 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg > with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being > the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks > of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access > tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. Interestingly I observed this contention on 2 socket EPYC servers (Zen3 and Zen4) while running tbench and netperf with David Vernet's shared-runqueue v3 patches. This contention was observed only when running with the shared-runqueue enabled but not otherwise. Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol + 20.54% tbench [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group + 15.78% tbench [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg This was causing the tbench (and netperf) to not scale beyond 32 clients when shared-runqueue was enabled. > > The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup > path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus > Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions > and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's > load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change > involves an update to tg->load_avg. With the shared-runqueue patches, we see a lot more task migrations since the newidle_balance() path would pull tasks from the shared-runqueue. While the read of tg->load_avg is via READ_ONCE on x86, the write is atomic. > Since the workload can trigger as many > wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg > can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable > overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: > during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is > 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. > > Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once > per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly > reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. I will try this patch on with David's series today. -- Thanks and Regards gautham. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-16 4:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy @ 2023-08-16 5:55 ` Aaron Lu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-16 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gautham R. Shenoy Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel, David Vernet Hi Gautham, Thanks for sharing this information. On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:12:52AM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > Hello Aaron, > (Adding David Vernet) > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:48:31AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > > When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance > > with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times > > update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on > > a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): > > > > 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > > 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > > > Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg > > with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being > > the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks > > of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access > > tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. > > > Interestingly I observed this contention on 2 socket EPYC servers > (Zen3 and Zen4) while running tbench and netperf with David Vernet's > shared-runqueue v3 patches. This contention was observed only when > running with the shared-runqueue enabled but not otherwise. I think without shared-runqueue, the migration number is pretty low on EPYC since it has much smaller LLC than Intel's. > > Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol > + 20.54% tbench [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > + 15.78% tbench [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > This was causing the tbench (and netperf) to not scale beyond 32 > clients when shared-runqueue was enabled. > > > > > The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup > > path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus > > Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions > > and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's > > load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change > > involves an update to tg->load_avg. > > With the shared-runqueue patches, we see a lot more task migrations > since the newidle_balance() path would pull tasks from the > shared-runqueue. While the read of tg->load_avg is via READ_ONCE on > x86, the write is atomic. That makes sense. More migrations, more overhead from update_load_avg() and update_cfs_group(). > > > Since the workload can trigger as many > > wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg > > can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable > > overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: > > during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is > > 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. > > > > Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once > > per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly > > reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. > > I will try this patch on with David's series today. Look forward to see your numbers. Thanks, Aaron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-16 2:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg Aaron Lu 2023-08-16 4:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy @ 2023-08-17 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot 2023-08-21 6:06 ` Aaron Lu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Vincent Guittot @ 2023-08-17 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Lu Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 04:48, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote: > > When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance > with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times > update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on > a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): > > 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg > with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being > the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks > of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access > tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. > > The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup > path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus > Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions > and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's > load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change > involves an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many > wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg > can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable > overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: > during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is > 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. > > Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once > per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly > reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. > > ============================== > postgres_sysbench on SPR: > 25% > base: 42382±19.8% > patch: 50174±9.5% (noise) > > 50% > base: 67626±1.3% > patch: 67365±3.1% (noise) > > 75% > base: 100216±1.2% > patch: 112470±0.1% +12.2% > > 100% > base: 93671±0.4% > patch: 113563±0.2% +21.2% > > ============================== > hackbench on ICL: > group=1 > base: 114912±5.2% > patch: 117857±2.5% (noise) > > group=4 > base: 359902±1.6% > patch: 361685±2.7% (noise) > > group=8 > base: 461070±0.8% > patch: 491713±0.3% +6.6% > > group=16 > base: 309032±5.0% > patch: 378337±1.3% +22.4% > > ============================= > hackbench on SPR: > group=1 > base: 100768±2.9% > patch: 103134±2.9% (noise) > > group=4 > base: 413830±12.5% > patch: 378660±16.6% (noise) > > group=8 > base: 436124±0.6% > patch: 490787±3.2% +12.5% > > group=16 > base: 457730±3.2% > patch: 680452±1.3% +48.8% > > ============================ > netperf/udp_rr on ICL > 25% > base: 114413±0.1% > patch: 115111±0.0% +0.6% > > 50% > base: 86803±0.5% > patch: 86611±0.0% (noise) > > 75% > base: 35959±5.3% > patch: 49801±0.6% +38.5% > > 100% > base: 61951±6.4% > patch: 70224±0.8% +13.4% > > =========================== > netperf/udp_rr on SPR > 25% > base: 104954±1.3% > patch: 107312±2.8% (noise) > > 50% > base: 55394±4.6% > patch: 54940±7.4% (noise) > > 75% > base: 13779±3.1% > patch: 36105±1.1% +162% > > 100% > base: 9703±3.7% > patch: 28011±0.2% +189% > > ============================================== > netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range) > 25% > base: 43092±0.1% > patch: 42891±0.5% > > 50% > base: 19278±14.9% > patch: 22369±7.2% > > 75% > base: 16822±3.0% > patch: 17086±2.3% > > 100% > base: 18216±0.6% > patch: 18078±2.9% > > =============================================== > netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range) > 25% > base: 34491±0.3% > patch: 34886±0.5% > > 50% > base: 19278±14.9% > patch: 22369±7.2% > > 75% > base: 16822±3.0% > patch: 17086±2.3% > > 100% > base: 18216±0.6% > patch: 18078±2.9% > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 6e79de26a25d..ab055c72cc64 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -3664,7 +3664,8 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > */ > static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > { > - long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > + long delta; > + u64 now; > > /* > * No need to update load_avg for root_task_group as it is not used. > @@ -3672,9 +3673,19 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group) > return; > > + /* > + * For migration heavy workload, access to tg->load_avg can be > + * unbound. Limit the update rate to at most once per ms. > + */ > + now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))); > + if (now - cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg < NSEC_PER_MSEC) > + return; > + > + delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) { > atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg); > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg; > + cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg = now; > } > } > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > index 19af1766df2d..228a298bf3b5 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; > + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; Moving last_update_tg_load_avg before tg_load_avg_contrib should minimize the padding on 32bits arch as long is only 4 Bytes Apart from this, looks good to me > long propagate; > long prop_runnable_sum; > > -- > 2.41.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-17 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot @ 2023-08-21 6:06 ` Aaron Lu 2023-08-21 11:57 ` Vincent Guittot 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-21 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 04:48, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote: > > > > When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance > > with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times > > update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on > > a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): > > > > 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > > 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > > > Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg > > with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being > > the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks > > of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access > > tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. > > > > The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup > > path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus > > Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions > > and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's > > load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change > > involves an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many > > wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg > > can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable > > overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: > > during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is > > 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. > > > > Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once > > per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly > > reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. > > > > ============================== > > postgres_sysbench on SPR: > > 25% > > base: 42382±19.8% > > patch: 50174±9.5% (noise) > > > > 50% > > base: 67626±1.3% > > patch: 67365±3.1% (noise) > > > > 75% > > base: 100216±1.2% > > patch: 112470±0.1% +12.2% > > > > 100% > > base: 93671±0.4% > > patch: 113563±0.2% +21.2% > > > > ============================== > > hackbench on ICL: > > group=1 > > base: 114912±5.2% > > patch: 117857±2.5% (noise) > > > > group=4 > > base: 359902±1.6% > > patch: 361685±2.7% (noise) > > > > group=8 > > base: 461070±0.8% > > patch: 491713±0.3% +6.6% > > > > group=16 > > base: 309032±5.0% > > patch: 378337±1.3% +22.4% > > > > ============================= > > hackbench on SPR: > > group=1 > > base: 100768±2.9% > > patch: 103134±2.9% (noise) > > > > group=4 > > base: 413830±12.5% > > patch: 378660±16.6% (noise) > > > > group=8 > > base: 436124±0.6% > > patch: 490787±3.2% +12.5% > > > > group=16 > > base: 457730±3.2% > > patch: 680452±1.3% +48.8% > > > > ============================ > > netperf/udp_rr on ICL > > 25% > > base: 114413±0.1% > > patch: 115111±0.0% +0.6% > > > > 50% > > base: 86803±0.5% > > patch: 86611±0.0% (noise) > > > > 75% > > base: 35959±5.3% > > patch: 49801±0.6% +38.5% > > > > 100% > > base: 61951±6.4% > > patch: 70224±0.8% +13.4% > > > > =========================== > > netperf/udp_rr on SPR > > 25% > > base: 104954±1.3% > > patch: 107312±2.8% (noise) > > > > 50% > > base: 55394±4.6% > > patch: 54940±7.4% (noise) > > > > 75% > > base: 13779±3.1% > > patch: 36105±1.1% +162% > > > > 100% > > base: 9703±3.7% > > patch: 28011±0.2% +189% > > > > ============================================== > > netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range) > > 25% > > base: 43092±0.1% > > patch: 42891±0.5% > > > > 50% > > base: 19278±14.9% > > patch: 22369±7.2% > > > > 75% > > base: 16822±3.0% > > patch: 17086±2.3% > > > > 100% > > base: 18216±0.6% > > patch: 18078±2.9% > > > > =============================================== > > netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range) > > 25% > > base: 34491±0.3% > > patch: 34886±0.5% > > > > 50% > > base: 19278±14.9% > > patch: 22369±7.2% > > > > 75% > > base: 16822±3.0% > > patch: 17086±2.3% > > > > 100% > > base: 18216±0.6% > > patch: 18078±2.9% > > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> > > --- > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > index 6e79de26a25d..ab055c72cc64 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > @@ -3664,7 +3664,8 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > */ > > static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > { > > - long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > > + long delta; > > + u64 now; > > > > /* > > * No need to update load_avg for root_task_group as it is not used. > > @@ -3672,9 +3673,19 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group) > > return; > > > > + /* > > + * For migration heavy workload, access to tg->load_avg can be > > + * unbound. Limit the update rate to at most once per ms. > > + */ > > + now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))); > > + if (now - cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg < NSEC_PER_MSEC) > > + return; > > + > > + delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > > if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) { > > atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg); > > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg; > > + cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg = now; > > } > > } > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > > index 19af1766df2d..228a298bf3b5 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > > unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; > > + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; > > Moving last_update_tg_load_avg before tg_load_avg_contrib should > minimize the padding on 32bits arch as long is only 4 Bytes Got it. That would be: diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 6a8b7b9ed089..52ee7027def9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { } removed; #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; long propagate; long prop_runnable_sum; -- 2.41.0 > > Apart from this, looks good to me Thanks a lot for your review! Can I add your reviewed-by in my next update with the above change? Regards, Aaron > > long propagate; > > long prop_runnable_sum; > > > > -- > > 2.41.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg 2023-08-21 6:06 ` Aaron Lu @ 2023-08-21 11:57 ` Vincent Guittot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vincent Guittot @ 2023-08-21 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Lu Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Daniel Jordan, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Valentin Schneider, Tim Chen, Nitin Tekchandani, Yu Chen, Waiman Long, Deng Pan, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 at 08:06, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 04:48, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance > > > with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times > > > update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on > > > a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): > > > > > > 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group > > > 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg > > > > > > Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg > > > with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being > > > the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks > > > of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access > > > tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. > > > > > > The frequent access to tg->load_avg is due to task migration on wakeup > > > path, e.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus > > > Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions > > > and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's > > > load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change > > > involves an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many > > > wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg > > > can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable > > > overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: > > > during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is > > > 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. > > > > > > Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once > > > per ms. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly > > > reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. > > > > > > ============================== > > > postgres_sysbench on SPR: > > > 25% > > > base: 42382ą19.8% > > > patch: 50174ą9.5% (noise) > > > > > > 50% > > > base: 67626ą1.3% > > > patch: 67365ą3.1% (noise) > > > > > > 75% > > > base: 100216ą1.2% > > > patch: 112470ą0.1% +12.2% > > > > > > 100% > > > base: 93671ą0.4% > > > patch: 113563ą0.2% +21.2% > > > > > > ============================== > > > hackbench on ICL: > > > group=1 > > > base: 114912ą5.2% > > > patch: 117857ą2.5% (noise) > > > > > > group=4 > > > base: 359902ą1.6% > > > patch: 361685ą2.7% (noise) > > > > > > group=8 > > > base: 461070ą0.8% > > > patch: 491713ą0.3% +6.6% > > > > > > group=16 > > > base: 309032ą5.0% > > > patch: 378337ą1.3% +22.4% > > > > > > ============================= > > > hackbench on SPR: > > > group=1 > > > base: 100768ą2.9% > > > patch: 103134ą2.9% (noise) > > > > > > group=4 > > > base: 413830ą12.5% > > > patch: 378660ą16.6% (noise) > > > > > > group=8 > > > base: 436124ą0.6% > > > patch: 490787ą3.2% +12.5% > > > > > > group=16 > > > base: 457730ą3.2% > > > patch: 680452ą1.3% +48.8% > > > > > > ============================ > > > netperf/udp_rr on ICL > > > 25% > > > base: 114413ą0.1% > > > patch: 115111ą0.0% +0.6% > > > > > > 50% > > > base: 86803ą0.5% > > > patch: 86611ą0.0% (noise) > > > > > > 75% > > > base: 35959ą5.3% > > > patch: 49801ą0.6% +38.5% > > > > > > 100% > > > base: 61951ą6.4% > > > patch: 70224ą0.8% +13.4% > > > > > > =========================== > > > netperf/udp_rr on SPR > > > 25% > > > base: 104954ą1.3% > > > patch: 107312ą2.8% (noise) > > > > > > 50% > > > base: 55394ą4.6% > > > patch: 54940ą7.4% (noise) > > > > > > 75% > > > base: 13779ą3.1% > > > patch: 36105ą1.1% +162% > > > > > > 100% > > > base: 9703ą3.7% > > > patch: 28011ą0.2% +189% > > > > > > ============================================== > > > netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range) > > > 25% > > > base: 43092ą0.1% > > > patch: 42891ą0.5% > > > > > > 50% > > > base: 19278ą14.9% > > > patch: 22369ą7.2% > > > > > > 75% > > > base: 16822ą3.0% > > > patch: 17086ą2.3% > > > > > > 100% > > > base: 18216ą0.6% > > > patch: 18078ą2.9% > > > > > > =============================================== > > > netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range) > > > 25% > > > base: 34491ą0.3% > > > patch: 34886ą0.5% > > > > > > 50% > > > base: 19278ą14.9% > > > patch: 22369ą7.2% > > > > > > 75% > > > base: 16822ą3.0% > > > patch: 17086ą2.3% > > > > > > 100% > > > base: 18216ą0.6% > > > patch: 18078ą2.9% > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> > > > --- > > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > > index 6e79de26a25d..ab055c72cc64 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > > @@ -3664,7 +3664,8 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > > */ > > > static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > > { > > > - long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > > > + long delta; > > > + u64 now; > > > > > > /* > > > * No need to update load_avg for root_task_group as it is not used. > > > @@ -3672,9 +3673,19 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > > > if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group) > > > return; > > > > > > + /* > > > + * For migration heavy workload, access to tg->load_avg can be > > > + * unbound. Limit the update rate to at most once per ms. > > > + */ > > > + now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))); > > > + if (now - cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg < NSEC_PER_MSEC) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib; > > > if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) { > > > atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg); > > > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg; > > > + cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg = now; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > > > index 19af1766df2d..228a298bf3b5 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > > > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > > > unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; > > > + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; > > > > Moving last_update_tg_load_avg before tg_load_avg_contrib should > > minimize the padding on 32bits arch as long is only 4 Bytes > > Got it. That would be: > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > index 6a8b7b9ed089..52ee7027def9 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ struct cfs_rq { > } removed; > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > + u64 last_update_tg_load_avg; > unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib; > long propagate; > long prop_runnable_sum; > -- > 2.41.0 > > > > > Apart from this, looks good to me > > Thanks a lot for your review! > Can I add your reviewed-by in my next update with the above change? Yes with the above Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > > Regards, > Aaron > > > > long propagate; > > > long prop_runnable_sum; > > > > > > -- > > > 2.41.0 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-21 11:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-08-16 2:48 [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Reduce cost of accessing tg->load_avg Aaron Lu 2023-08-16 2:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: ratelimit update to tg->load_avg Aaron Lu 2023-08-16 4:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy 2023-08-16 5:55 ` Aaron Lu 2023-08-17 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot 2023-08-21 6:06 ` Aaron Lu 2023-08-21 11:57 ` Vincent Guittot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox