* [PATCH] tracing: relax trace_event_eval_update() execution with schedule()
@ 2023-09-29 14:13 Clément Léger
2023-09-29 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Clément Léger @ 2023-09-29 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Clément Léger, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel,
Atish Patra
When kernel is compiled without preemption, the eval_map_work_func()
(which calls trace_event_eval_update()) will not be preempted up to its
complete execution. This can actually cause a problem since if another
CPU call stop_machine(), the call will have to wait for the
eval_map_work_func() function to finish executing in the workqueue
before being able to be scheduled. This problem was observe on a SMP
system at boot time, when the CPU calling the initcalls executed
clocksource_done_booting() which in the end calls stop_machine(). We
observed a 1 second delay because one CPU was executing
eval_map_work_func() and was not preempted by the stop_machine() task.
Adding a call to schedule() in trace_event_eval_update() allows to let
other tasks to be executed and thus continue working asynchronously like
before without blocking any pending task at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 91951d038ba4..dbdf57a081c0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -2770,6 +2770,7 @@ void trace_event_eval_update(struct trace_eval_map **map, int len)
update_event_fields(call, map[i]);
}
}
+ schedule();
}
up_write(&trace_event_sem);
}
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tracing: relax trace_event_eval_update() execution with schedule()
2023-09-29 14:13 [PATCH] tracing: relax trace_event_eval_update() execution with schedule() Clément Léger
@ 2023-09-29 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-29 15:10 ` Clément Léger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2023-09-29 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clément Léger
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Atish Patra
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:13:48 +0200
Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> When kernel is compiled without preemption, the eval_map_work_func()
> (which calls trace_event_eval_update()) will not be preempted up to its
> complete execution. This can actually cause a problem since if another
> CPU call stop_machine(), the call will have to wait for the
> eval_map_work_func() function to finish executing in the workqueue
> before being able to be scheduled. This problem was observe on a SMP
> system at boot time, when the CPU calling the initcalls executed
> clocksource_done_booting() which in the end calls stop_machine(). We
> observed a 1 second delay because one CPU was executing
> eval_map_work_func() and was not preempted by the stop_machine() task.
>
> Adding a call to schedule() in trace_event_eval_update() allows to let
> other tasks to be executed and thus continue working asynchronously like
> before without blocking any pending task at boot time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 91951d038ba4..dbdf57a081c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -2770,6 +2770,7 @@ void trace_event_eval_update(struct trace_eval_map **map, int len)
> update_event_fields(call, map[i]);
> }
> }
> + schedule();
The proper answer to this is "cond_resched()" but still, there's going
to be work to get rid of all that soon [1]. But I'll take a cond_resched()
now until that is implemented.
-- Steve
> }
> up_write(&trace_event_sem);
> }
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87cyyfxd4k.ffs@tglx/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tracing: relax trace_event_eval_update() execution with schedule()
2023-09-29 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2023-09-29 15:10 ` Clément Léger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Clément Léger @ 2023-09-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Atish Patra
On 29/09/2023 17:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:13:48 +0200
> Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
>> When kernel is compiled without preemption, the eval_map_work_func()
>> (which calls trace_event_eval_update()) will not be preempted up to its
>> complete execution. This can actually cause a problem since if another
>> CPU call stop_machine(), the call will have to wait for the
>> eval_map_work_func() function to finish executing in the workqueue
>> before being able to be scheduled. This problem was observe on a SMP
>> system at boot time, when the CPU calling the initcalls executed
>> clocksource_done_booting() which in the end calls stop_machine(). We
>> observed a 1 second delay because one CPU was executing
>> eval_map_work_func() and was not preempted by the stop_machine() task.
>>
>> Adding a call to schedule() in trace_event_eval_update() allows to let
>> other tasks to be executed and thus continue working asynchronously like
>> before without blocking any pending task at boot time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> index 91951d038ba4..dbdf57a081c0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> @@ -2770,6 +2770,7 @@ void trace_event_eval_update(struct trace_eval_map **map, int len)
>> update_event_fields(call, map[i]);
>> }
>> }
>> + schedule();
>
> The proper answer to this is "cond_resched()" but still, there's going
> to be work to get rid of all that soon [1]. But I'll take a cond_resched()
> now until that is implemented.
Hi Steven,
Thanks for the information, I'll update the patch and send a V2.
Clément
>
> -- Steve
>
>> }
>> up_write(&trace_event_sem);
>> }
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87cyyfxd4k.ffs@tglx/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-29 15:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-29 14:13 [PATCH] tracing: relax trace_event_eval_update() execution with schedule() Clément Léger
2023-09-29 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-29 15:10 ` Clément Léger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox