public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 29/41] afs: Dispatch vlserver probes in priority order
Date: Thu,  9 Nov 2023 15:39:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231109154004.3317227-30-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231109154004.3317227-1-dhowells@redhat.com>

When probing all the addresses for a volume location server, dispatch them
in order of descending priority to try and get back highest priority one
first.

Also add a tracepoint to show the transmission and completion of the
probes.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
---
 fs/afs/internal.h          |  1 +
 fs/afs/vl_list.c           |  2 ++
 fs/afs/vl_probe.c          | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 include/trace/events/afs.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/internal.h b/fs/afs/internal.h
index 90b82e50da18..b88589bb4a6e 100644
--- a/fs/afs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/afs/internal.h
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver {
 	rwlock_t		lock;		/* Lock on addresses */
 	refcount_t		ref;
 	unsigned int		rtt;		/* Server's current RTT in uS */
+	unsigned int		debug_id;
 
 	/* Probe state */
 	wait_queue_head_t	probe_wq;
diff --git a/fs/afs/vl_list.c b/fs/afs/vl_list.c
index 5c4cd71caccf..9b1c20daac53 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vl_list.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vl_list.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver *afs_alloc_vlserver(const char *name, size_t name_len,
 					unsigned short port)
 {
 	struct afs_vlserver *vlserver;
+	static atomic_t debug_ids;
 
 	vlserver = kzalloc(struct_size(vlserver, name, name_len + 1),
 			   GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver *afs_alloc_vlserver(const char *name, size_t name_len,
 		rwlock_init(&vlserver->lock);
 		init_waitqueue_head(&vlserver->probe_wq);
 		spin_lock_init(&vlserver->probe_lock);
+		vlserver->debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&debug_ids);
 		vlserver->rtt = UINT_MAX;
 		vlserver->name_len = name_len;
 		vlserver->service_id = VL_SERVICE;
diff --git a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
index f868ae5d40e5..b128dc3d8af7 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void afs_vlserver_probe_result(struct afs_call *call)
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&server->probe_lock);
 
+	trace_afs_vl_probe(server, false, alist, index, call->error, call->abort_code, rtt_us);
 	_debug("probe [%u][%u] %pISpc rtt=%d ret=%d",
 	       server_index, index, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr(addr->peer),
 	       rtt_us, ret);
@@ -150,8 +151,10 @@ static bool afs_do_probe_vlserver(struct afs_net *net,
 {
 	struct afs_addr_list *alist;
 	struct afs_call *call;
-	unsigned int index;
+	unsigned long unprobed;
+	unsigned int index, i;
 	bool in_progress = false;
+	int best_prio;
 
 	_enter("%s", server->name);
 
@@ -165,7 +168,20 @@ static bool afs_do_probe_vlserver(struct afs_net *net,
 	memset(&server->probe, 0, sizeof(server->probe));
 	server->probe.rtt = UINT_MAX;
 
-	for (index = 0; index < alist->nr_addrs; index++) {
+	unprobed = (1UL << alist->nr_addrs) - 1;
+	while (unprobed) {
+		best_prio = -1;
+		index = 0;
+		for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++) {
+			if (test_bit(i, &unprobed) &&
+			    alist->addrs[i].prio > best_prio) {
+				index = i;
+				best_prio = alist->addrs[i].prio;
+			}
+		}
+		__clear_bit(index, &unprobed);
+
+		trace_afs_vl_probe(server, true, alist, index, 0, 0, 0);
 		call = afs_vl_get_capabilities(net, alist, index, key, server,
 					       server_index);
 		if (!IS_ERR(call)) {
diff --git a/include/trace/events/afs.h b/include/trace/events/afs.h
index 81eb87fbcfa7..f1815b3dafb0 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/afs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/afs.h
@@ -1420,6 +1420,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(afs_fs_probe,
 		      &__entry->srx.transport)
 	    );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(afs_vl_probe,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct afs_vlserver *server, bool tx, struct afs_addr_list *alist,
+		     unsigned int addr_index, int error, s32 abort_code, unsigned int rtt_us),
+
+	    TP_ARGS(server, tx, alist, addr_index, error, abort_code, rtt_us),
+
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		    __field(unsigned int,		server)
+		    __field(bool,			tx)
+		    __field(unsigned short,		flags)
+		    __field(u16,			addr_index)
+		    __field(short,			error)
+		    __field(s32,			abort_code)
+		    __field(unsigned int,		rtt_us)
+		    __field_struct(struct sockaddr_rxrpc, srx)
+			     ),
+
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+		    __entry->server = server->debug_id;
+		    __entry->tx = tx;
+		    __entry->addr_index = addr_index;
+		    __entry->error = error;
+		    __entry->abort_code = abort_code;
+		    __entry->rtt_us = rtt_us;
+		    memcpy(&__entry->srx, rxrpc_kernel_remote_srx(alist->addrs[addr_index].peer),
+			   sizeof(__entry->srx));
+			   ),
+
+	    TP_printk("vl=%08x %s ax=%u e=%d ac=%d rtt=%d %pISpc",
+		      __entry->server, __entry->tx ? "tx" : "rx", __entry->addr_index,
+		      __entry->error, __entry->abort_code, __entry->rtt_us,
+		      &__entry->srx.transport)
+	    );
+
 #endif /* _TRACE_AFS_H */
 
 /* This part must be outside protection */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-09 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09 15:39 [PATCH 00/41] afs: Fix probe handling, server rotation and RO volume callback handling David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 01/41] rxrpc: Fix RTT determination to use PING ACKs as a source David Howells
2023-11-09 17:16   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 22:06     ` David Howells
2023-11-10 14:15       ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-10 16:12         ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-10 17:25         ` David Howells
2023-11-10 21:54           ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 02/41] rxrpc: Fix two connection reaping bugs David Howells
2023-11-09 17:27   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 17:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 03/41] rxrpc: Fix some minor issues with bundle tracing David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 04/41] afs: Fix afs_server_list to be cleaned up with RCU David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 05/41] afs: Make error on cell lookup failure consistent with OpenAFS David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 06/41] afs: Remove whitespace before most ')' from the trace header David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 07/41] afs: Automatically generate trace tag enums David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 08/41] afs: Add comments on abort handling David Howells
2023-11-09 17:41   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 09/41] afs: Turn the afs_addr_list address array into an array of structs David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 10/41] rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objects David Howells
2023-11-09 17:48   ` Marc Dionne
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 11/41] afs: Don't skip server addresses for which we didn't get an RTT reading David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 12/41] afs: Rename addr_list::failed to probe_failed David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 13/41] afs: Handle the VIO abort explicitly David Howells
2023-11-09 18:12   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 14/41] afs: Use op->nr_iterations=-1 to indicate to begin fileserver iteration David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 15/41] afs: Return ENOENT if no cell DNS record can be found David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 16/41] afs: Wrap most op->error accesses with inline funcs David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 17/41] afs: Don't put afs_call in afs_wait_for_call_to_complete() David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 18/41] afs: Simplify error handling David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 19/41] afs: Add a tracepoint for struct afs_addr_list David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 20/41] afs: Rename some fields David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 21/41] afs: Use peer + service_id as call address David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 22/41] afs: Fold the afs_addr_cursor struct in David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 23/41] rxrpc: Create a procfile to display outstanding clien conn bundles David Howells
2023-11-09 18:20   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 24/41] afs: Add some more info to /proc/net/afs/servers David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 25/41] afs: Remove the unimplemented afs_cmp_addr_list() David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 26/41] afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 27/41] afs: Mark address lists with configured priorities David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 28/41] afs: Dispatch fileserver probes in priority order David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 30/41] afs: Keep a record of the current fileserver endpoint state David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 31/41] afs: Combine the endpoint state bools into a bitmask David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 32/41] afs: Fix file locking on R/O volumes to operate in local mode David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 33/41] afs: Mark a superblock for an R/O or Backup volume as SB_RDONLY David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 34/41] afs: Make it possible to find the volumes that are using a server David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 35/41] afs: Defer volume record destruction to a workqueue David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 36/41] afs: Move the vnode/volume validity checking code into its own file David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 37/41] afs: Apply server breaks to mmap'd files in the call processor David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 38/41] afs: Parse the VolSync record in the reply of a number of RPC ops David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 39/41] afs: Overhaul invalidation handling to better support RO volumes David Howells
2023-11-09 19:00   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-13 15:58     ` [PATCH 42/41] afs: Fix the handling of " David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 40/41] afs: Fix fileserver rotation David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 41/41] afs: Fix offline and busy handling David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231109154004.3317227-30-dhowells@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox