public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey E Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/41] rxrpc: Fix RTT determination to use PING ACKs as a source
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:15:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c19af528-1aad-412c-8362-275c791dd76f@auristor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3327953.1699567608@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2874 bytes --]

On 11/9/2023 5:06 PM, David Howells wrote:
> I do not believe the ack_reason matters within rxrpc_input_ack(). As 
> long as
>> the acked_serial is non-zero,
>> rxrpc_complete_rtt_probe() can be called to attempt to compute an RTT.   If
>> there is an exact match for the
>> acked_serial then an RTT can be computed and if acked_serial is later than the
>> pending rtt probe, the probe
>> can be abandoned with the following caveats.
>>
>> 1. Receiving an acked_serial that is later than the serial of the
>>     transmitted probe indicates that a packet
>>     transmitted after the probe was received first.  Or that reordering
>>     of the transmitted packets occurred.
>>     Or that the probe was never received by the peer; or that the peer's
>>     response to the probe was lost in
>>     transit.
>> 2. The serial number namespace is unsigned 32-bit shared across all of
>>     the call channels of the associated
>>     rx connection.  As the serial numbers will wrap the use of after()
>>     within rxrpc_complete_rtt_probe to
>>     compare their values is questionable.   If serial numbers will be
>>     compared in this manner then they
>>     need to be locally tracked and compared as unsigned 64-bit values
>>     where only the low 32-bits are
>>     transmitted on the wire and any wire serial number equal to zero is
>>     ignored.
> I do ignore ack.serial == 0 for this purpose.

Zero has the special meaning - this ACK is not explicitly in response to 
a received packet.

However, as mentioned, the serial number counter wraps frequently and 
most RxRPC implementations
do not transition from serial 0xffffffff -> 0x00000001 when wrapping.

> I'm not sure how expanding it internally to 64-bits actually helps since the
> upper 32 bits is not visible to the peer.
rxrpc_complete_rtt_probe contains the following logic that relies on 
after() being able to detect
a serial number wrap.

         /* If a later serial is being acked, then mark this slot as
          * being available.
          */

         if (after(acked_serial, orig_serial)) {
             trace_rxrpc_rtt_rx(call, rxrpc_rtt_rx_obsolete, i,
                        orig_serial, acked_serial, 0, 0);
             clear_bit(i + RXRPC_CALL_RTT_PEND_SHIFT, &call->rtt_avail);
             smp_wmb();
             set_bit(i, &call->rtt_avail);
         }

Otherwise, acked_serial = 0x01 will be considered smaller than 
orig_serial = 0xfffffffe and the slot will not be marked available.

I will note that there is a similar problem with rxrpc_seq_t values 
which are u32 on the wire but which will wrap for calls that transmit 
more than approximately 5.5TB of data. Calls of this size are unlikely 
for a cache manager but are common for any service transmitting volume 
dumps.

Jeffrey Altman


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4039 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-10 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09 15:39 [PATCH 00/41] afs: Fix probe handling, server rotation and RO volume callback handling David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 01/41] rxrpc: Fix RTT determination to use PING ACKs as a source David Howells
2023-11-09 17:16   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 22:06     ` David Howells
2023-11-10 14:15       ` Jeffrey E Altman [this message]
2023-11-10 16:12         ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-10 17:25         ` David Howells
2023-11-10 21:54           ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 02/41] rxrpc: Fix two connection reaping bugs David Howells
2023-11-09 17:27   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 17:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 03/41] rxrpc: Fix some minor issues with bundle tracing David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 04/41] afs: Fix afs_server_list to be cleaned up with RCU David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 05/41] afs: Make error on cell lookup failure consistent with OpenAFS David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 06/41] afs: Remove whitespace before most ')' from the trace header David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 07/41] afs: Automatically generate trace tag enums David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 08/41] afs: Add comments on abort handling David Howells
2023-11-09 17:41   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 09/41] afs: Turn the afs_addr_list address array into an array of structs David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 10/41] rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objects David Howells
2023-11-09 17:48   ` Marc Dionne
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 11/41] afs: Don't skip server addresses for which we didn't get an RTT reading David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 12/41] afs: Rename addr_list::failed to probe_failed David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 13/41] afs: Handle the VIO abort explicitly David Howells
2023-11-09 18:12   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 14/41] afs: Use op->nr_iterations=-1 to indicate to begin fileserver iteration David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 15/41] afs: Return ENOENT if no cell DNS record can be found David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 16/41] afs: Wrap most op->error accesses with inline funcs David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 17/41] afs: Don't put afs_call in afs_wait_for_call_to_complete() David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 18/41] afs: Simplify error handling David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 19/41] afs: Add a tracepoint for struct afs_addr_list David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 20/41] afs: Rename some fields David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 21/41] afs: Use peer + service_id as call address David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 22/41] afs: Fold the afs_addr_cursor struct in David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 23/41] rxrpc: Create a procfile to display outstanding clien conn bundles David Howells
2023-11-09 18:20   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 24/41] afs: Add some more info to /proc/net/afs/servers David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 25/41] afs: Remove the unimplemented afs_cmp_addr_list() David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 26/41] afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 27/41] afs: Mark address lists with configured priorities David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 28/41] afs: Dispatch fileserver probes in priority order David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 29/41] afs: Dispatch vlserver " David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 30/41] afs: Keep a record of the current fileserver endpoint state David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 31/41] afs: Combine the endpoint state bools into a bitmask David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 32/41] afs: Fix file locking on R/O volumes to operate in local mode David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 33/41] afs: Mark a superblock for an R/O or Backup volume as SB_RDONLY David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 34/41] afs: Make it possible to find the volumes that are using a server David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 35/41] afs: Defer volume record destruction to a workqueue David Howells
2023-11-09 15:39 ` [PATCH 36/41] afs: Move the vnode/volume validity checking code into its own file David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 37/41] afs: Apply server breaks to mmap'd files in the call processor David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 38/41] afs: Parse the VolSync record in the reply of a number of RPC ops David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 39/41] afs: Overhaul invalidation handling to better support RO volumes David Howells
2023-11-09 19:00   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2023-11-13 15:58     ` [PATCH 42/41] afs: Fix the handling of " David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 40/41] afs: Fix fileserver rotation David Howells
2023-11-09 15:40 ` [PATCH 41/41] afs: Fix offline and busy handling David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c19af528-1aad-412c-8362-275c791dd76f@auristor.com \
    --to=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox