From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq cpumask changes
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116161929.232885-5-juri.lelli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116161929.232885-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
When workqueue cpumask changes are committed the associated rescuer (if
one exists) affinity is not touched and this might be a problem down the
line for isolated setups.
Make sure rescuers affinity is updated every time a workqueue cpumask
changes, so that rescuers can't break isolation.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 2ef6573909070..df7f2f2bfd0c8 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4416,6 +4416,12 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
link_pwq(ctx->dfl_pwq);
swap(ctx->wq->dfl_pwq, ctx->dfl_pwq);
+ /* rescuer needs to respect wq cpumask changes */
+ if (ctx->wq->rescuer) {
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(ctx->wq->rescuer->task, ctx->attrs->cpumask);
+ wake_up_process(ctx->wq->rescuer->task);
+ }
+
mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 16:19 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Fix handling of rescuers affinity Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 16:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] tools/workqueue: Add rescuers printing to wq_dump.py Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 16:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] kernel/workqueue: Bind rescuer to unbound cpumask for WQ_UNBOUND Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 18:47 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-17 6:30 ` Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 16:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] kernel/workqueue: Distinguish between general unbound and WQ_SYSFS cpumask changes Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 18:57 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-17 13:06 ` Juri Lelli
2024-01-17 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-17 19:32 ` Waiman Long
2024-01-17 19:42 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-18 12:52 ` Juri Lelli
2024-01-16 16:19 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2024-01-17 3:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq " Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-17 6:30 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240116161929.232885-5-juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox