* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-02-14 23:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-15 6:41 ` Ron Economos
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-02-14 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml
On 2/14/24 06:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 23:57 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-02-15 6:41 ` Ron Economos
2024-02-15 8:19 ` Shreeya Patel
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-02-15 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On 2/14/24 6:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 23:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-15 6:41 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-02-15 8:19 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-02-15 8:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-02-15 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml,
Gustavo Padovan, kernelci-regressions mailing list
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 20:00 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.1.y:
Date: 2024-02-14
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=ea6a03790c420fec42790d8c5db2e81663954186
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 8:19 ` Shreeya Patel
@ 2024-02-15 8:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-02-15 11:02 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-02-15 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 20:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.78-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: ea6a03790c420fec42790d8c5db2e81663954186
* git describe: v6.1.77-66-gea6a03790c42
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.77-66-gea6a03790c42
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.77)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.77)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.77)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.77)
## Test result summary
total: 138874, pass: 117646, fail: 2876, skip: 18182, xfail: 170
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 151 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 52 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 34 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 45 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 8:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-02-15 11:02 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-15 11:04 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-02-15 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:30:19 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.78-rc2-gea6a03790c42
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 11:02 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-15 11:04 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-15 11:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 11:27 ` Pavel Machek
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-02-15 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On 14/02/2024 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.7:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 6.7.5-rc2-gc94a8b48bd4b
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-15 11:04 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-15 11:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 11:12 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-02-15 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:04:11AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 14/02/2024 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> > There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> No new regressions for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.7:
> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.7.5-rc2-gc94a8b48bd4b
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
You sent 2 of these, one without a failure, and one with?
confused,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-15 11:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-02-15 11:12 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-02-15 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On 15/02/2024 11:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:04:11AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 14/02/2024 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
>>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>>
>> No new regressions for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.7:
>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>> 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
>> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>>
>> Linux version: 6.7.5-rc2-gc94a8b48bd4b
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> You sent 2 of these, one without a failure, and one with?
Sorry the above is for v6.7 and so responded to the wrong one. So v6.1
is all good.
> confused,
Yes I confused myself too.
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 11:04 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-15 11:27 ` Pavel Machek
2024-02-15 16:49 ` Allen
2024-02-15 20:12 ` Mateusz Jończyk
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-02-15 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
No problems detected with 6.6.17-rc2 or 6.7.5-rc2, either.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 11:27 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-02-15 16:49 ` Allen
2024-02-15 20:12 ` Mateusz Jończyk
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-02-15 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review
2024-02-14 14:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-15 16:49 ` Allen
@ 2024-02-15 20:12 ` Mateusz Jończyk
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-02-15 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable; +Cc: patches, linux-kernel
W dniu 14.02.2024 o 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hello,
Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.
Used technologies:
- ext4, vfat,
- LUKS, LVM,
- mdraid on top of NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in a write-mostly mode).
Tested:
- GPU (Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620, with a 3D game)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- Bluetooth (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- USB soundcard (Logitech Pro X),
- PCI soundcard (Intel HD Audio),
- webcam,
- suspend to disk, suspend to RAM,
- NFS (light usage).
Issues found: none
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Greetings,
Mateusz Jończyk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread