public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz,
	jlayton@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, peter@korsgaard.com,
	hayama@lineo.co.jp, dmantipov@yandex.ru,
	quic_linyyuan@quicinc.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_ppratap@quicinc.com,
	quic_wcheng@quicinc.com, quic_jackp@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete()
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:58:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024022302-routine-schematic-b4fd@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223054809.2379-1-quic_selvaras@quicinc.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:48:09PM -0800, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> In scenarios of continuous and parallel usage of multiple FFS interfaces
> and concurrent adb operations (e.g., adb root, adb reboot), there's a
> chance that ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() might be processed after
> ffs_epfile_release(). This could lead to a NULL pointer dereference of
> ffs when accessing the ffs pointer in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as
> ffs is freed as part of ffs_epfile_release(). This epfile release is
> part of file operation and is triggered when user space daemons restart
> themselves or a reboot is initiated.
> 
> Fix this issue by adding a NULL pointer check for ffs in
> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().
> 
> [  9981.393115] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001e0
> [  9981.402854] Mem abort info:
> ...
> [  9981.532540] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies,
> [  9981.540579] pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [  9981.548438] pc : ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c
> [  9981.554529] lr : usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0
> ...
> [  9981.645057] Call trace:
> [  9981.648282]  ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c
> [  9981.654004]  usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0
> [  9981.659637]  dwc3_gadget_endpoint_trbs_complete+0x1a8/0x48c
> [  9981.666074]  dwc3_process_event_entry+0x378/0x648
> [  9981.671622]  dwc3_process_event_buf+0x6c/0x288
> [  9981.676903]  dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x3c/0x68
> [  9981.682003]  irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x8c
> [  9981.686388]  irq_thread+0x198/0x2ac
> [  9981.690685]  kthread+0x154/0x218
> [  9981.694717]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> 
> Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com>

What commit id does this fix?  Should it go to stable kernels?

> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> index be3851cffb73..d8c8e88628f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep,
>  	usb_ep_free_request(_ep, req);
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&io_data->work, ffs_user_copy_worker);
> -	queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work);
> +
> +	if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq)
> +		queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work);

What happens if ffs->io_compleation_wq goes away right after you test
it but before you call queue_work()?

Where is the locking here to prevent that?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  5:48 [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-02-23  5:58 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-02-23 11:35   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-02-23 12:40     ` Greg KH
2024-02-23 14:43     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024022302-routine-schematic-b4fd@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=hayama@lineo.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@korsgaard.com \
    --cc=quic_jackp@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_linyyuan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_ppratap@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_selvaras@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox