* [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() @ 2024-02-23 5:48 Selvarasu Ganesan 2024-02-23 5:58 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Selvarasu Ganesan @ 2024-02-23 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, brauner, axboe, jack, jlayton, keescook, peter, hayama, dmantipov, quic_linyyuan Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, quic_ppratap, quic_wcheng, quic_jackp, Selvarasu Ganesan In scenarios of continuous and parallel usage of multiple FFS interfaces and concurrent adb operations (e.g., adb root, adb reboot), there's a chance that ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() might be processed after ffs_epfile_release(). This could lead to a NULL pointer dereference of ffs when accessing the ffs pointer in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as ffs is freed as part of ffs_epfile_release(). This epfile release is part of file operation and is triggered when user space daemons restart themselves or a reboot is initiated. Fix this issue by adding a NULL pointer check for ffs in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). [ 9981.393115] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001e0 [ 9981.402854] Mem abort info: ... [ 9981.532540] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, [ 9981.540579] pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 9981.548438] pc : ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c [ 9981.554529] lr : usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 ... [ 9981.645057] Call trace: [ 9981.648282] ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c [ 9981.654004] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 [ 9981.659637] dwc3_gadget_endpoint_trbs_complete+0x1a8/0x48c [ 9981.666074] dwc3_process_event_entry+0x378/0x648 [ 9981.671622] dwc3_process_event_buf+0x6c/0x288 [ 9981.676903] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x3c/0x68 [ 9981.682003] irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x8c [ 9981.686388] irq_thread+0x198/0x2ac [ 9981.690685] kthread+0x154/0x218 [ 9981.694717] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com> --- drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c index be3851cffb73..d8c8e88628f9 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, usb_ep_free_request(_ep, req); INIT_WORK(&io_data->work, ffs_user_copy_worker); - queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); + + if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) + queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); } static void __ffs_epfile_read_buffer_free(struct ffs_epfile *epfile) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() 2024-02-23 5:48 [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() Selvarasu Ganesan @ 2024-02-23 5:58 ` Greg KH 2024-02-23 11:35 ` Selvarasu Ganesan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2024-02-23 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Selvarasu Ganesan Cc: brauner, axboe, jack, jlayton, keescook, peter, hayama, dmantipov, quic_linyyuan, linux-usb, linux-kernel, quic_ppratap, quic_wcheng, quic_jackp On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:48:09PM -0800, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote: > In scenarios of continuous and parallel usage of multiple FFS interfaces > and concurrent adb operations (e.g., adb root, adb reboot), there's a > chance that ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() might be processed after > ffs_epfile_release(). This could lead to a NULL pointer dereference of > ffs when accessing the ffs pointer in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as > ffs is freed as part of ffs_epfile_release(). This epfile release is > part of file operation and is triggered when user space daemons restart > themselves or a reboot is initiated. > > Fix this issue by adding a NULL pointer check for ffs in > ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). > > [ 9981.393115] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001e0 > [ 9981.402854] Mem abort info: > ... > [ 9981.532540] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, > [ 9981.540579] pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > [ 9981.548438] pc : ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c > [ 9981.554529] lr : usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 > ... > [ 9981.645057] Call trace: > [ 9981.648282] ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c > [ 9981.654004] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 > [ 9981.659637] dwc3_gadget_endpoint_trbs_complete+0x1a8/0x48c > [ 9981.666074] dwc3_process_event_entry+0x378/0x648 > [ 9981.671622] dwc3_process_event_buf+0x6c/0x288 > [ 9981.676903] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x3c/0x68 > [ 9981.682003] irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x8c > [ 9981.686388] irq_thread+0x198/0x2ac > [ 9981.690685] kthread+0x154/0x218 > [ 9981.694717] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com> What commit id does this fix? Should it go to stable kernels? > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > index be3851cffb73..d8c8e88628f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, > usb_ep_free_request(_ep, req); > > INIT_WORK(&io_data->work, ffs_user_copy_worker); > - queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); > + > + if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) > + queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); What happens if ffs->io_compleation_wq goes away right after you test it but before you call queue_work()? Where is the locking here to prevent that? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() 2024-02-23 5:58 ` Greg KH @ 2024-02-23 11:35 ` Selvarasu Ganesan 2024-02-23 12:40 ` Greg KH 2024-02-23 14:43 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Selvarasu Ganesan @ 2024-02-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: brauner, axboe, jack, jlayton, keescook, peter, hayama, dmantipov, quic_linyyuan, linux-usb, linux-kernel, quic_ppratap, quic_wcheng, quic_jackp On 2/23/2024 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:48:09PM -0800, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote: >> In scenarios of continuous and parallel usage of multiple FFS interfaces >> and concurrent adb operations (e.g., adb root, adb reboot), there's a >> chance that ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() might be processed after >> ffs_epfile_release(). This could lead to a NULL pointer dereference of >> ffs when accessing the ffs pointer in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as >> ffs is freed as part of ffs_epfile_release(). This epfile release is >> part of file operation and is triggered when user space daemons restart >> themselves or a reboot is initiated. >> >> Fix this issue by adding a NULL pointer check for ffs in >> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). >> >> [ 9981.393115] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001e0 >> [ 9981.402854] Mem abort info: >> ... >> [ 9981.532540] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, >> [ 9981.540579] pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) >> [ 9981.548438] pc : ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c >> [ 9981.554529] lr : usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 >> ... >> [ 9981.645057] Call trace: >> [ 9981.648282] ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c >> [ 9981.654004] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 >> [ 9981.659637] dwc3_gadget_endpoint_trbs_complete+0x1a8/0x48c >> [ 9981.666074] dwc3_process_event_entry+0x378/0x648 >> [ 9981.671622] dwc3_process_event_buf+0x6c/0x288 >> [ 9981.676903] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x3c/0x68 >> [ 9981.682003] irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x8c >> [ 9981.686388] irq_thread+0x198/0x2ac >> [ 9981.690685] kthread+0x154/0x218 >> [ 9981.694717] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 >> >> Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com> > > What commit id does this fix? Should it go to stable kernels? Fixes: 2e4c7553cd6f9 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: add aio support"). Yes it's required to propagate to stable kernel as well. > >> --- >> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c >> index be3851cffb73..d8c8e88628f9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c >> @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, >> usb_ep_free_request(_ep, req); >> >> INIT_WORK(&io_data->work, ffs_user_copy_worker); >> - queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); >> + >> + if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) >> + queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); > > What happens if ffs->io_compleation_wq goes away right after you test > it but before you call queue_work()? > > Where is the locking here to prevent that? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi Greg, Thank you for your feedback. I understand your concern about the potential race condition with ffs->io_completion_wq. I’m considering introducing a lock to protect this section of the code, but I wanted to get your opinion on this. In the f_fs.c driver, there are pre-existing locks. Would it be suitable to utilize these locks, or do you suggest the creation of a new lock specifically for ffs->io_completion_wq? We anticipate a performance impact if we use the existing lock, as it might be held by different threads. What are your thoughts on this?" Here’s what the code might look like with a new lock: static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, struct usb_request *req) { .... spin_lock(&ffs->new_lock); if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); spin_unlock(&ffs->new_lock); .... } static void ffs_data_put(struct ffs_data *ffs) { ... destroy_workqueue(ffs->io_completion_wq); kfree(ffs->dev_name); spin_lock(&ffs->new_lock); kfree(ffs); spin_unlock(&ffs->new_lock); ... } Thanks, Selva ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() 2024-02-23 11:35 ` Selvarasu Ganesan @ 2024-02-23 12:40 ` Greg KH 2024-02-23 14:43 ` Jens Axboe 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2024-02-23 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Selvarasu Ganesan Cc: brauner, axboe, jack, jlayton, keescook, peter, hayama, dmantipov, quic_linyyuan, linux-usb, linux-kernel, quic_ppratap, quic_wcheng, quic_jackp On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:05:59PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote: > > On 2/23/2024 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:48:09PM -0800, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote: > > > In scenarios of continuous and parallel usage of multiple FFS interfaces > > > and concurrent adb operations (e.g., adb root, adb reboot), there's a > > > chance that ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() might be processed after > > > ffs_epfile_release(). This could lead to a NULL pointer dereference of > > > ffs when accessing the ffs pointer in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as > > > ffs is freed as part of ffs_epfile_release(). This epfile release is > > > part of file operation and is triggered when user space daemons restart > > > themselves or a reboot is initiated. > > > > > > Fix this issue by adding a NULL pointer check for ffs in > > > ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). > > > > > > [ 9981.393115] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001e0 > > > [ 9981.402854] Mem abort info: > > > ... > > > [ 9981.532540] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, > > > [ 9981.540579] pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > > [ 9981.548438] pc : ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c > > > [ 9981.554529] lr : usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 > > > ... > > > [ 9981.645057] Call trace: > > > [ 9981.648282] ffs_epfile_async_io_complete+0x38/0x4c > > > [ 9981.654004] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x30/0xd0 > > > [ 9981.659637] dwc3_gadget_endpoint_trbs_complete+0x1a8/0x48c > > > [ 9981.666074] dwc3_process_event_entry+0x378/0x648 > > > [ 9981.671622] dwc3_process_event_buf+0x6c/0x288 > > > [ 9981.676903] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x3c/0x68 > > > [ 9981.682003] irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x8c > > > [ 9981.686388] irq_thread+0x198/0x2ac > > > [ 9981.690685] kthread+0x154/0x218 > > > [ 9981.694717] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <quic_selvaras@quicinc.com> > > > > What commit id does this fix? Should it go to stable kernels? > > Fixes: 2e4c7553cd6f9 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: add aio support"). Yes it's > required to propagate to stable kernel as well. Great, when you resend the next version, please include both proper tags. > > > --- > > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > > > index be3851cffb73..d8c8e88628f9 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c > > > @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, > > > usb_ep_free_request(_ep, req); > > > INIT_WORK(&io_data->work, ffs_user_copy_worker); > > > - queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); > > > + > > > + if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) > > > + queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); > > > > What happens if ffs->io_compleation_wq goes away right after you test > > it but before you call queue_work()? > > > > Where is the locking here to prevent that? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Greg, > > Thank you for your feedback. I understand your concern about the > potential race condition with ffs->io_completion_wq. I’m considering > introducing a lock to protect this section of the code, but I wanted to > get your opinion on this. > In the f_fs.c driver, there are pre-existing locks. Would it be suitable to > utilize these locks, or do you suggest the creation of a new lock > specifically for ffs->io_completion_wq? We anticipate a performance impact > if we use the existing lock, as it might be held by different > threads. What are your thoughts on this?" Test it out yourself and see what works best! thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() 2024-02-23 11:35 ` Selvarasu Ganesan 2024-02-23 12:40 ` Greg KH @ 2024-02-23 14:43 ` Jens Axboe 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2024-02-23 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Selvarasu Ganesan, Greg KH Cc: brauner, jack, jlayton, keescook, peter, hayama, dmantipov, quic_linyyuan, linux-usb, linux-kernel, quic_ppratap, quic_wcheng, quic_jackp On 2/23/24 4:35 AM, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote: > Here?s what the code might look like with a new lock: > > static void ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(struct usb_ep *_ep, > struct usb_request *req) > { > .... > spin_lock(&ffs->new_lock); > if (ffs && ffs->io_completion_wq) > queue_work(ffs->io_completion_wq, &io_data->work); > spin_unlock(&ffs->new_lock); > .... > } > > > > static void ffs_data_put(struct ffs_data *ffs) { > ... > destroy_workqueue(ffs->io_completion_wq); > kfree(ffs->dev_name); > spin_lock(&ffs->new_lock); > kfree(ffs); > spin_unlock(&ffs->new_lock); > ... > } This obviously won't work at all, and it's not the right way to fix it at all. It needs a ref count. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-23 14:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-02-23 5:48 [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() Selvarasu Ganesan 2024-02-23 5:58 ` Greg KH 2024-02-23 11:35 ` Selvarasu Ganesan 2024-02-23 12:40 ` Greg KH 2024-02-23 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox