* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-03-04 22:50 ` SeongJae Park
2024-03-05 4:52 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-03-04 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, damon,
SeongJae Park
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 21:23:33 +0000 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] e7cbbec10c6e ("Linux 5.15.151-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-04 22:50 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-03-05 4:52 ` Ron Economos
2024-03-05 10:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-03-05 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On 3/4/24 1:23 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-04 22:50 ` SeongJae Park
2024-03-05 4:52 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-03-05 10:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-05 11:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-03-05 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Zong Li,
Palmer Dabbelt, Alexandre Ghiti, Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Following build failures noticed on riscv.
The riscv tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.15.
The riscv defconfig, tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.10.
linux.5.15.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:
build:
* gcc-12-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-allnoconfig
* clang-17-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allnoconfig
linux.5.10.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:
* gcc-8-defconfig
* clang-17-allnoconfig
* gcc-12-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-allnoconfig
* gcc-8-allmodconfig
* clang-17-defconfig
* gcc-12-defconfig
* clang-17-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allmodconfig
* gcc-8-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allnoconfig
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c:39:9: error: implicit declaration
of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
39 | arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Suspecting patch,
riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support
commit 680341382da56bd192ebfa4e58eaf4fec2e5bca7 upstream.
steps to reproduce:
---
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-12
--kconfig defconfig
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/v5.15.149-332-ge7cbbec10c6e/testrun/22942335/suite/test/gcc-12-allnoconfig/history/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF68wn0dXbU2xGLRyzsxGdXTyB/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941782/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/details/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941144/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/history/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF5ke88GqtfanduGie1JGLUbVa/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-05 10:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-03-05 11:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-03-05 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Zong Li,
Palmer Dabbelt, Alexandre Ghiti, Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:38:20PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> > There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Following build failures noticed on riscv.
>
> The riscv tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.15.
> The riscv defconfig, tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.10.
>
> linux.5.15.y build failures on riscv.
> riscv:
> build:
> * gcc-12-tinyconfig
> * gcc-8-allnoconfig
> * clang-17-tinyconfig
> * gcc-8-tinyconfig
> * gcc-12-allnoconfig
>
> linux.5.10.y build failures on riscv.
> riscv:
>
> * gcc-8-defconfig
> * clang-17-allnoconfig
> * gcc-12-tinyconfig
> * gcc-8-allnoconfig
> * gcc-8-allmodconfig
> * clang-17-defconfig
> * gcc-12-defconfig
> * clang-17-tinyconfig
> * gcc-12-allmodconfig
> * gcc-8-tinyconfig
> * gcc-12-allnoconfig
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c:39:9: error: implicit declaration
> of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 39 | arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> Suspecting patch,
>
> riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support
> commit 680341382da56bd192ebfa4e58eaf4fec2e5bca7 upstream.
Thanks, will go drop this and push out -rc2 kernels for 5.15 and 5.10
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-05 10:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
2024-03-05 11:43 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-03-05 19:05 ` Shuah Khan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-03-05 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:23:33 +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
102 tests: 102 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.151-rc1-ge7cbbec10c6e
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-03-05 11:43 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-03-05 19:05 ` Shuah Khan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-03-05 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 05/03/24 02:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.15 00/84] 5.15.151-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-05 11:43 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-03-05 19:05 ` Shuah Khan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-03-05 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Shuah Khan
On 3/4/24 14:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.151 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread