From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] spi: sun6i: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:16:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240429131600.4e910d8a@donnerap.manchester.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429112843.67628-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:28:40 +0200
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
Hi,
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> index cd018ea1abf1..7bbe7ea0d66a 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *host,
> struct spi_transfer *tfr)
> {
> struct sun6i_spi *sspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(host);
> - unsigned int div, div_cdr1, div_cdr2, timeout;
> + unsigned int div, div_cdr1, div_cdr2;
> + unsigned long time_left;
> unsigned int start, end, tx_time;
> unsigned int trig_level;
> unsigned int tx_len = 0, rx_len = 0, nbits = 0;
> @@ -488,26 +489,26 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *host,
>
> tx_time = spi_controller_xfer_timeout(host, tfr);
> start = jiffies;
> - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->done,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(tx_time));
> + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->done,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(tx_time));
>
> if (!use_dma) {
> sun6i_spi_drain_fifo(sspi);
> } else {
> - if (timeout && rx_len) {
> + if (time_left && rx_len) {
> /*
> * Even though RX on the peripheral side has finished
> * RX DMA might still be in flight
> */
> - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->dma_rx_done,
> - timeout);
> - if (!timeout)
> + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->dma_rx_done,
> + time_left);
Nit: indentation is off here. Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cheers,
Andre
> + if (!time_left)
> dev_warn(&host->dev, "RX DMA timeout\n");
> }
> }
>
> end = jiffies;
> - if (!timeout) {
> + if (!time_left) {
> dev_warn(&host->dev,
> "%s: timeout transferring %u bytes@%iHz for %i(%i)ms",
> dev_name(&spi->dev), tfr->len, tfr->speed_hz,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 11:28 [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] spi: armada-3700: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] spi: fsl-lpspi: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] spi: imx: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-30 1:35 ` Peng Fan
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] spi: pic32-sqi: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] spi: pic32: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] spi: sun4i: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:14 ` Andre Przywara
2024-04-29 15:19 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] spi: sun6i: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:16 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2024-04-29 14:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 15:20 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] spi: xlp: " Wolfram Sang
2024-05-02 3:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240429131600.4e910d8a@donnerap.manchester.arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox