public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jernej Škrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
To: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] spi: sun6i: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:20:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4885599.GXAFRqVoOG@jernej-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429112843.67628-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Dne ponedeljek, 29. april 2024 ob 13:28:40 GMT +2 je Wolfram Sang napisal(a):
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jernej

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> index cd018ea1abf1..7bbe7ea0d66a 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *host,
>  				  struct spi_transfer *tfr)
>  {
>  	struct sun6i_spi *sspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(host);
> -	unsigned int div, div_cdr1, div_cdr2, timeout;
> +	unsigned int div, div_cdr1, div_cdr2;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  	unsigned int start, end, tx_time;
>  	unsigned int trig_level;
>  	unsigned int tx_len = 0, rx_len = 0, nbits = 0;
> @@ -488,26 +489,26 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *host,
>  
>  	tx_time = spi_controller_xfer_timeout(host, tfr);
>  	start = jiffies;
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->done,
> -					      msecs_to_jiffies(tx_time));
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->done,
> +						msecs_to_jiffies(tx_time));
>  
>  	if (!use_dma) {
>  		sun6i_spi_drain_fifo(sspi);
>  	} else {
> -		if (timeout && rx_len) {
> +		if (time_left && rx_len) {
>  			/*
>  			 * Even though RX on the peripheral side has finished
>  			 * RX DMA might still be in flight
>  			 */
> -			timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->dma_rx_done,
> -							      timeout);
> -			if (!timeout)
> +			time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sspi->dma_rx_done,
> +							      time_left);
> +			if (!time_left)
>  				dev_warn(&host->dev, "RX DMA timeout\n");
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	end = jiffies;
> -	if (!timeout) {
> +	if (!time_left) {
>  		dev_warn(&host->dev,
>  			 "%s: timeout transferring %u bytes@%iHz for %i(%i)ms",
>  			 dev_name(&spi->dev), tfr->len, tfr->speed_hz,
> 





  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-29 11:28 [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] spi: armada-3700: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 15:15   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] spi: fsl-lpspi: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] spi: imx: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-30  1:35   ` Peng Fan
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] spi: pic32-sqi: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] spi: pic32: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] spi: sun4i: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:14   ` Andre Przywara
2024-04-29 15:19   ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] spi: sun6i: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:16   ` Andre Przywara
2024-04-29 14:36     ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 15:20   ` Jernej Škrabec [this message]
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] spi: xlp: " Wolfram Sang
2024-05-02  3:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4885599.GXAFRqVoOG@jernej-laptop \
    --to=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox