public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
@ 2024-05-23 13:12 Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-05-23 17:03 ` SeongJae Park
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-05-23 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
	shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.92-rc1

Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
    docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21

Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
    admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling: fix return type of PR_SCHED_CORE_GET

Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
    KEYS: trusted: Do not use WARN when encode fails

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
    remoteproc: mediatek: Make sure IPI buffer fits in L2TCM

Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
    serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code

Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
    usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x

Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
    usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock

Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
    net: usb: ax88179_178a: fix link status when link is set to down/up

Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
    usb: dwc3: Wait unconditionally after issuing EndXfer command

Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
    binder: fix max_thread type inconsistency

Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
    drm/amdgpu: Fix possible NULL dereference in amdgpu_ras_query_error_status_helper()

Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
    arm64: atomics: lse: remove stale dependency on JUMP_LABEL

Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
    xfs: short circuit xfs_growfs_data_private() if delta is zero

Hironori Shiina <shiina.hironori@gmail.com>
    xfs: get root inode correctly at bulkstat

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: fix log recovery when unknown rocompat bits are set

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: allow inode inactivation during a ro mount log recovery

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: invalidate xfs_bufs when allocating cow extents

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: estimate post-merge refcounts correctly

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: hoist refcount record merge predicates

Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
    xfs: fix super block buf log item UAF during force shutdown

Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
    xfs: wait iclog complete before tearing down AIL

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: attach dquots to inode before reading data/cow fork mappings

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: invalidate block device page cache during unmount

Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
    xfs: fix incorrect i_nlink caused by inode racing

Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
    xfs: fix sb write verify for lazysbcount

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: fix incorrect error-out in xfs_remove

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: fix off-by-one-block in xfs_discard_folio()

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: drop write error injection is unfixable, remove it

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: use iomap_valid method to detect stale cached iomaps

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    iomap: write iomap validity checks

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range() should take a byte range

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    iomap: buffered write failure should not truncate the page cache

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs,iomap: move delalloc punching to iomap

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: use byte ranges for write cleanup ranges

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: punching delalloc extents on write failure is racy

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: write page faults in iomap are not buffered writes

Mengqi Zhang <mengqi.zhang@mediatek.com>
    mmc: core: Add HS400 tuning in HS400es initialization

Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
    KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode()

NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
    nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.

Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
    mfd: stpmic1: Fix swapped mask/unmask in irq chip

Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
    pinctrl: core: handle radix_tree_insert() errors in pinctrl_register_one_pin()

Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
    ice: remove unnecessary duplicate checks for VF VSI ID

Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
    ice: pass VSI pointer into ice_vc_isvalid_q_id

Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
    net: ks8851: Fix another TX stall caused by wrong ISR flag handling

Jose Fernandez <josef@netflix.com>
    drm/amd/display: Fix division by zero in setup_dsc_config


-------------

Diffstat:

 .../admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst        |   4 +-
 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py             |   1 -
 Makefile                                           |   4 +-
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                                 |   1 -
 arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h                       |   1 -
 drivers/android/binder.c                           |   2 +-
 drivers/android/binder_internal.h                  |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c            |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c        |   7 +-
 drivers/mfd/stpmic1.c                              |   5 +-
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c                             |   9 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c      |  22 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_fdir.c |   3 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_common.c        |  18 +-
 drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c                     |  37 ++-
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c                             |  14 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                       |  10 +-
 drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c                        |  30 ++-
 drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c                          |   4 +-
 drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c                      |  45 ++--
 drivers/usb/typec/tipd/tps6598x.h                  |  11 +
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c               |   4 -
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c                             | 254 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/iomap/iter.c                                    |  19 +-
 fs/nfs/callback.c                                  |   9 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c                                 |   5 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c                                   |  12 -
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c                           |   8 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_errortag.h                       |  12 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c                       | 146 ++++++++++--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c                             |   7 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c                                  |  37 +--
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c                             |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h                             |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                                   |   1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c                              |   2 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_error.c                                 |  27 ++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c                                  |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c                                 |   4 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c                                |   6 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c                                 |  16 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c                                 |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c                                 | 177 ++++++++------
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h                                 |   6 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c                                   |  53 ++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c                                 |  15 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c                                  |   6 +-
 include/linux/iomap.h                              |  47 +++-
 net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c                              |  16 +-
 security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c          |  25 +-
 50 files changed, 866 insertions(+), 299 deletions(-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-05-23 17:03 ` SeongJae Park
  2024-05-23 18:17 ` Mark Brown
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-05-23 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
	linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon

Hello,

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:51 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 662b26bd104f ("Linux 6.1.92-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m
_remote_run_corr.sh SUCCESS

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-05-23 17:03 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-05-23 18:17 ` Mark Brown
  2024-05-23 20:21 ` Florian Fainelli
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-05-23 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-05-23 17:03 ` SeongJae Park
  2024-05-23 18:17 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-05-23 20:21 ` Florian Fainelli
  2024-05-24  8:13 ` Anders Roxell
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-05-23 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
	conor, allen.lkml, broonie

On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-23 20:21 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-05-24  8:13 ` Anders Roxell
  2024-05-24 11:21 ` Pavel Machek
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anders Roxell @ 2024-05-24  8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build Summary
* arc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 135 total, 135 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24  8:13 ` Anders Roxell
@ 2024-05-24 11:21 ` Pavel Machek
  2024-05-24 14:37 ` Shuah Khan
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-05-24 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 658 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24 11:21 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-05-24 14:37 ` Shuah Khan
  2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-05-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan

On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24 14:37 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
  2024-05-24 20:35 ` Mateusz Jończyk
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-05-24 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
	shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
	linux-tegra, stable

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:51 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    116 tests:	116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.1.92-rc1-g662b26bd104f
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-05-24 20:35 ` Mateusz Jończyk
  2024-05-24 20:38 ` Ron Economos
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-05-24 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

W dniu 23.05.2024 o 15:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hello,

Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>

Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.

Stack:
- amd64,
- ext4 on top of LVM on top of LUKS on top of mdraid on top of
  NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in the write-mostly mode).

Tested (lightly):
- suspend to RAM,
- suspend to disk,
- virtual machines in QEMU (both i386 and amd64 guests),

- GPU (Intel HD Graphics 620, tested with an Unigine benchmark)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- USB soundcard (Logitech Pro X),
- PCI soundcard (Intel HD Audio),
- Bluetooth (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- webcam.

Filesystems tested very lightly (mounting, listing and opening files):
- NFS,
- exFAT
- NTFS via FUSE

Greetings,
Mateusz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24 20:35 ` Mateusz Jończyk
@ 2024-05-24 20:38 ` Ron Economos
  2024-05-25  1:06 ` Kelsey Steele
  2024-05-25 16:25 ` Allen
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-05-24 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

On 5/23/24 6:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-24 20:38 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-05-25  1:06 ` Kelsey Steele
  2024-05-25 16:25 ` Allen
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-05-25  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).

Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.

Thank you. :)

Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review
  2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-25  1:06 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-05-25 16:25 ` Allen
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-05-25 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, broonie

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.92 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-25 16:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.1 00/45] 6.1.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 17:03 ` SeongJae Park
2024-05-23 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-23 20:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-24  8:13 ` Anders Roxell
2024-05-24 11:21 ` Pavel Machek
2024-05-24 14:37 ` Shuah Khan
2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
2024-05-24 20:35 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-05-24 20:38 ` Ron Economos
2024-05-25  1:06 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-05-25 16:25 ` Allen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox