From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] tools/nolibc: use attribute((naked)) if available
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 11:25:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240803092558.GB29127@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240728-nolibc-llvm-v1-4-bc384269bc35@weissschuh.net>
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:09:58PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The current entrypoint attributes optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer")
> are intended to avoid all compiler generated code, like function
> porologue and epilogue.
> This is the exact usecase implemented by the attribute "naked".
>
> Unfortunately this is not implemented by GCC for all targets,
> so only use it where available.
> This also provides compatibility with clang, which recognizes the
> "naked" attribute but not the previously used attribute "optimized".
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> ---
> tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h b/tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h
> index fe3701863634..f77bb7d3e1a8 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@
> #define __entrypoint __attribute__((optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer")))
> #define __entrypoint_epilogue() __builtin_unreachable()
>
> +#if defined(__has_attribute)
> +# if __has_attribute(naked)
> +# undef __entrypoint
> +# define __entrypoint __attribute__((naked))
> +# undef __entrypoint_epilogue
> +# define __entrypoint_epilogue()
> +# endif
> +#endif /* defined(__has_attribute) */
I would find it cleaner to enclose the previous declaration with the #if
rather than #undef everything just after it has been defined. Also it's
not very common to undo declarations just after they've been done, and
it makes quick code analysis harder.
I think that it can resolve to roughly this:
#if defined(__has_attribute) && __has_attribute(naked)
# define __entrypoint __attribute__((naked))
# define __entrypoint_epilogue()
#else
# define __entrypoint __attribute__((optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer")))
# define __entrypoint_epilogue() __builtin_unreachable()
#endif
What do you think ?
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-03 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-28 10:09 [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:09 ` [PATCH 01/12] tools/nolibc: use clang-compatible asm syntax in arch-arm.h Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:09 ` [PATCH 02/12] tools/nolibc: limit powerpc stack-protector workaround to GCC Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:09 ` [PATCH 03/12] tools/nolibc: move entrypoint specifics to compiler.h Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 9:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-08-03 18:26 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:09 ` [PATCH 04/12] tools/nolibc: use attribute((naked)) if available Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 9:25 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2024-08-03 18:28 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 18:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-08-03 20:55 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-04 3:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-07-28 10:09 ` [PATCH 05/12] selftests/nolibc: report failure if no testcase passed Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 06/12] selftests/nolibc: avoid passing NULL to printf("%s") Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 9:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-08-03 18:29 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 18:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 07/12] selftests/nolibc: determine $(srctree) first Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 9:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-08-04 15:55 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] selftests/nolibc: setup objtree without Makefile.include Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 09/12] selftests/nolibc: add support for LLVM= parameter Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-03 9:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-08-04 15:59 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 10/12] selftests/nolibc: add cc-option compatible with clang cross builds Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 11/12] selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: avoid overwriting CFLAGS_EXTRA Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: allow building through LLVM Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-29 19:26 ` [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support Shuah Khan
2024-07-29 19:27 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-03 9:50 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240803092558.GB29127@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox