public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw: Select only supported masters for ACPI devices
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:58:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240919135854.16124-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> (raw)

The recently submitted fix-commit revealed a problem in the iDMA32
platform code. Even though the controller supported only a single master
the dw_dma_acpi_filter() method hard-coded two master interfaces with IDs
0 and 1. As a result the sanity check implemented in the commit
b336268dde75 ("dmaengine: dw: Add peripheral bus width verification") got
incorrect interface data width and thus prevented the client drivers
from configuring the DMA-channel with the EINVAL error returned. E.g. the
next error was printed for the PXA2xx SPI controller driver trying to
configure the requested channels:

> [  164.525604] pxa2xx_spi_pci 0000:00:07.1: DMA slave config failed
> [  164.536105] pxa2xx_spi_pci 0000:00:07.1: failed to get DMA TX descriptor
> [  164.543213] spidev spi-SPT0001:00: SPI transfer failed: -16

The problem would have been spotted much earlier if the iDMA32 controller
supported more than one master interfaces. But since it supports just a
single master and the iDMA32-specific code just ignores the master IDs in
the CTLLO preparation method, the issue has been gone unnoticed so far.

Fix the problem by specifying a single master ID for both memory and
peripheral devices on the ACPI-based platforms if there is only one master
available on the controller. Thus the issue noticed for the iDMA32
controllers will be eliminated and the ACPI-probed DW DMA controllers will
be configured with the correct master ID by default.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: b336268dde75 ("dmaengine: dw: Add peripheral bus width verification")
Fixes: 199244d69458 ("dmaengine: dw: add support of iDMA 32-bit hardware")
Reported-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/ZuXbCKUs1iOqFu51@black.fi.intel.com/
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/ZuXgI-VcHpMgbZ91@black.fi.intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>

---

Note I haven't got any device with the Intel Merrifield iDMA32 + SPI
PXA2xx pair to test out the solution. So any tests are very welcome. But
based on Andy' (see the reported-by links) and my investigations the fix
seems correct.
---
 drivers/dma/dw/acpi.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/acpi.c b/drivers/dma/dw/acpi.c
index c510c109d2c3..efbe8baeccbc 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw/acpi.c
@@ -8,15 +8,25 @@
 
 static bool dw_dma_acpi_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
 {
+	struct dw_dma *dw = to_dw_dma(chan->device);
 	struct acpi_dma_spec *dma_spec = param;
 	struct dw_dma_slave slave = {
 		.dma_dev = dma_spec->dev,
 		.src_id = dma_spec->slave_id,
 		.dst_id = dma_spec->slave_id,
 		.m_master = 0,
-		.p_master = 1,
 	};
 
+	/*
+	 * Fallback to using a single interface for both memory and peripheral
+	 * device if there is only one master I/F supported (e.g. iDMA32)
+	 */
+	if (dw->pdata->nr_masters == 0)
+		slave.p_master = 0;
+	else
+		slave.p_master = 1;
+
+
 	return dw_dma_filter(chan, &slave);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-09-19 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-19 13:58 Serge Semin [this message]
2024-09-19 15:14 ` [PATCH] dmaengine: dw: Select only supported masters for ACPI devices Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-19 16:10   ` Serge Semin
2024-09-19 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Serge Semin
2024-09-19 20:06   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20  8:52     ` Ferry Toth
2024-09-20 15:51       ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240919135854.16124-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --to=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fntoth@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox