[PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Colin Ian King]

The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
return of the call which appears to be missing.

Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
 
 	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
 
-	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
+	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.5

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Sakari Ailus]

Hi Colin,

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> return of the call which appears to be missing.
> 
> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
>  
>  	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
>  
> -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  

There seems to be a similar issues all around the driver. It'd be good to
fix them at the same time.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Tomi Valkeinen]

Hi,

On 03/10/2024 09:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
>> being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
>> the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
>> return of the call which appears to be missing.
>>
>> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
>>   
>>   	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
>>   
>> -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>> +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
> 
> There seems to be a similar issues all around the driver. It'd be good to
> fix them at the same time.

With similar issues, do you mean the code not checking the return value 
at all for i2c reads and writes?

In this particular case the code already checks the return value, but 
setting the return value was missing. With a quick browse, I didn't see 
other like this.

  Tomi

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Sakari Ailus]

Moi,

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:52:17PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 03/10/2024 09:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Colin,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> > > being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> > > the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> > > return of the call which appears to be missing.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
> > >   	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
> > > -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> > > +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> > >   	if (ret)
> > >   		return ret;
> > 
> > There seems to be a similar issues all around the driver. It'd be good to
> > fix them at the same time.
> 
> With similar issues, do you mean the code not checking the return value at
> all for i2c reads and writes?
> 
> In this particular case the code already checks the return value, but
> setting the return value was missing. With a quick browse, I didn't see
> other like this.

See e.g. ub960_clear_rx_errors(), ub960_log_status(),
ub960_rxport_set_strobe_pos() and ub960_rxport_set_strobe_range.

-- 
Terveisin,

Sakari Ailus

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Tomi Valkeinen]

On 03/10/2024 16:19, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Moi,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:52:17PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/10/2024 09:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Colin,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>>> The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
>>>> being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
>>>> the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
>>>> return of the call which appears to be missing.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>>>> index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>>>> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
>>>>    	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
>>>> -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>>>> +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>>>>    	if (ret)
>>>>    		return ret;
>>>
>>> There seems to be a similar issues all around the driver. It'd be good to
>>> fix them at the same time.
>>
>> With similar issues, do you mean the code not checking the return value at
>> all for i2c reads and writes?
>>
>> In this particular case the code already checks the return value, but
>> setting the return value was missing. With a quick browse, I didn't see
>> other like this.
> 
> See e.g. ub960_clear_rx_errors(), ub960_log_status(),
> ub960_rxport_set_strobe_pos() and ub960_rxport_set_strobe_range.

Right, those don't check the return value. So they're not the same as 
the one fixed in this patch.

I'm not arguing against adding error checks, but that's a big work and I 
think this patch is a different kind of fix which should be applied 
whether the additional error checks are added or not.

Also, while still not arguing against adding the checks, it looks quite 
common to not check the returns values. E.g. it's not just a few errors 
I see if I add __must_check to cci functions.

  Tomi

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Sakari Ailus]

Moi,

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 04:33:54PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 03/10/2024 16:19, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Moi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:52:17PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 03/10/2024 09:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi Colin,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > > > The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> > > > > being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> > > > > the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> > > > > return of the call which appears to be missing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
> > > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > > > index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> > > > > @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
> > > > >    	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
> > > > > -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> > > > > +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> > > > >    	if (ret)
> > > > >    		return ret;
> > > > 
> > > > There seems to be a similar issues all around the driver. It'd be good to
> > > > fix them at the same time.
> > > 
> > > With similar issues, do you mean the code not checking the return value at
> > > all for i2c reads and writes?
> > > 
> > > In this particular case the code already checks the return value, but
> > > setting the return value was missing. With a quick browse, I didn't see
> > > other like this.
> > 
> > See e.g. ub960_clear_rx_errors(), ub960_log_status(),
> > ub960_rxport_set_strobe_pos() and ub960_rxport_set_strobe_range.
> 
> Right, those don't check the return value. So they're not the same as the
> one fixed in this patch.
> 
> I'm not arguing against adding error checks, but that's a big work and I
> think this patch is a different kind of fix which should be applied whether
> the additional error checks are added or not.

How much of work that is really? It seems trivial, albeit there are a
number of locations that need to be fixed.

I'm fine with applying this but it'd be nice to add at least a FIXME:
comment to the code while at it.

> 
> Also, while still not arguing against adding the checks, it looks quite
> common to not check the returns values. E.g. it's not just a few errors I
> see if I add __must_check to cci functions.

I haven't seen this being as widespread in pretty much any other (upstream)
driver.

-- 
Terveisin,

Sakari Ailus

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Tomi Valkeinen]

On 02/10/2024 19:53, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> return of the call which appears to be missing.
> 
> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
>   
>   	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
>   
> -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   

Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

  Tomi

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Wed,  2 Oct 2024 17:53:29 +0100
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> escreveu:

> The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> return of the call which appears to be missing.
> 
> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>

No Cc: stable. Please follow the submission rules for fixes as stated
at:
	Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst

In summary, all patches containing fixes shall have a Cc stable. There 
are rules there for the very few exceptions where a patch is not meant
to be backported:

     Cc: <stable+noautosel@kernel.org> # reason goes here, and must be present



> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> index ffe5f25f8647..58424d8f72af 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_get_strobe_pos(struct ub960_data *priv,
>  
>  	clk_delay += v & UB960_IR_RX_ANA_STROBE_SET_CLK_DELAY_MASK;
>  
> -	ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
> +	ret = ub960_rxport_read(priv, nport, UB960_RR_SFILTER_STS_1, &v);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  



Thanks,
Mauro

Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Fix missing return check on ub960_rxport_read call

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:41:11AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed,  2 Oct 2024 17:53:29 +0100
> Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> > The function ub960_rxport_read is being called and afterwards ret is
> > being checked for any failures, however ret is not being assigned to
> > the return of the function call. Fix this by assigning ret to the
> > return of the call which appears to be missing.
> > 
> > Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> 
> No Cc: stable. Please follow the submission rules for fixes as stated
> at:
> 	Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> 
> In summary, all patches containing fixes shall have a Cc stable. There 
> are rules there for the very few exceptions where a patch is not meant
> to be backported:
> 
>      Cc: <stable+noautosel@kernel.org> # reason goes here, and must be present
> 

I don't think this patch belongs in stable.  It's doesn't fix a real life bug,
it's just static checker stuff.  I also don't think we should forbid it from
going to stable if it's required as a dependency to backport a different patch.

regards,
dan carpenter