* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-10-21 18:07 ` SeongJae Park
2024-10-21 18:24 ` Florian Fainelli
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-10-21 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:24:14 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/damonitor/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 6a7f9259c323 ("Linux 6.1.114-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh # SKIP
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh # SKIP
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 18:07 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-10-21 18:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-10-22 8:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 20:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-10-21 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 10/21/24 03:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
There is a new warning that got picked up on ARM 32-buit:
fs/udf/namei.c:878:1: warning: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger
than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
I was not able to locate a fix upstream for this, but it does appear to
come from ("udf: Convert udf_rename() to new directory iteration code").
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 18:24 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-10-22 8:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-10-22 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:24:26AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/21/24 03:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
> BMIPS_GENERIC:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
>
> There is a new warning that got picked up on ARM 32-buit:
>
> fs/udf/namei.c:878:1: warning: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger than
> 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> I was not able to locate a fix upstream for this, but it does appear to come
> from ("udf: Convert udf_rename() to new directory iteration code").
Ah, thanks for tracking this down. Odd that it's only showing up here
as these changes are all upstream, perhaps the stack size got increased
in a newer kernel to work around this issue?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 18:07 ` SeongJae Park
2024-10-21 18:24 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-10-21 20:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-10-22 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 22:36 ` Shuah Khan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-10-21 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
Jan Kara
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The arm allmodconfig build failed due to following warnings / errors with
toolchain clang-19.
For all other 32-bit arch builds it is noticed as a warning.
* arm, build
- clang-19-allmodconfig
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Build warning / error:
-----------
fs/udf/namei.c:747:12: error: stack frame size (1560) exceeds limit
(1280) in 'udf_rename' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
747 | static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
struct inode *old_dir,
| ^
1 error generated.
Links,
---
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.113-92-g6a7f9259c323/testrun/25501845/suite/build/test/clang-19-allmodconfig/details/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2nkFE9BnBhh1xegvL7gVqMnXz2x/
metadata:
---
git_describe: v6.1.113-92-g6a7f9259c323
git_repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git_sha: 6a7f9259c323c90fd1384904b8d547666568a716
config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2nkFE9BnBhh1xegvL7gVqMnXz2x/config
download_url: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2nkFE9BnBhh1xegvL7gVqMnXz2x/
toolchain: clang-19
arch: arm
config: allmodconfig
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 20:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-10-22 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-22 9:14 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-10-22 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
Jan Kara
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:38:59AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The arm allmodconfig build failed due to following warnings / errors with
> toolchain clang-19.
> For all other 32-bit arch builds it is noticed as a warning.
>
> * arm, build
> - clang-19-allmodconfig
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> Build warning / error:
> -----------
> fs/udf/namei.c:747:12: error: stack frame size (1560) exceeds limit
> (1280) in 'udf_rename' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
> 747 | static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> struct inode *old_dir,
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
Odd that this isn't seen in newer kernels, any chance you can bisect?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-22 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-10-22 9:14 ` Jan Kara
2024-10-22 13:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2024-10-22 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
Jan Kara
On Tue 22-10-24 10:56:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:38:59AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The arm allmodconfig build failed due to following warnings / errors with
> > toolchain clang-19.
> > For all other 32-bit arch builds it is noticed as a warning.
> >
> > * arm, build
> > - clang-19-allmodconfig
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > Build warning / error:
> > -----------
> > fs/udf/namei.c:747:12: error: stack frame size (1560) exceeds limit
> > (1280) in 'udf_rename' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
> > 747 | static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> > struct inode *old_dir,
> > | ^
> > 1 error generated.
>
> Odd that this isn't seen in newer kernels, any chance you can bisect?
Glancing over the commits in stable-rc it seems the series is missing
commit 0aba4860b0d021 ("udf: Allocate name buffer in directory iterator on
heap").
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-22 9:14 ` Jan Kara
@ 2024-10-22 13:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-10-22 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:14:18AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 22-10-24 10:56:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:38:59AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> > > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > The arm allmodconfig build failed due to following warnings / errors with
> > > toolchain clang-19.
> > > For all other 32-bit arch builds it is noticed as a warning.
> > >
> > > * arm, build
> > > - clang-19-allmodconfig
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Build warning / error:
> > > -----------
> > > fs/udf/namei.c:747:12: error: stack frame size (1560) exceeds limit
> > > (1280) in 'udf_rename' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
> > > 747 | static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> > > struct inode *old_dir,
> > > | ^
> > > 1 error generated.
> >
> > Odd that this isn't seen in newer kernels, any chance you can bisect?
>
> Glancing over the commits in stable-rc it seems the series is missing
> commit 0aba4860b0d021 ("udf: Allocate name buffer in directory iterator on
> heap").
Thanks, I'll go queue that up now.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-21 20:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-10-21 22:36 ` Shuah Khan
2024-10-22 10:00 ` Pavel Machek
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-10-21 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 10/21/24 04:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-21 22:36 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-10-22 10:00 ` Pavel Machek
2024-10-22 12:59 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-10-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 10:00 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-10-22 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-22 13:50 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-10-22 17:56 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-10-22 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:24:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 12:59 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-10-22 13:50 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-10-22 17:56 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yann Sionneau @ 2024-10-22 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Hi Greg,
On 10/21/24 12:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
I tested 6.1.114-rc1 (6a7f9259c323c) on Kalray kvx arch (not upstream
yet) and everything looks good!
It ran on real hw (k200, k200lp and k300 boards), on qemu and on our
internal instruction set simulator (ISS).
Tests were run on several interfaces/drivers (usb, qsfp ethernet, eMMC,
PCIe endpoint+RC, SPI, remoteproc, uart, iommu). LTP and uClibc-ng
testsuites are also run without any regression.
Everything looks fine to us.
Tested-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
--
Yann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:24 [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 13:50 ` Yann Sionneau
@ 2024-10-22 17:56 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-22 17:58 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-23 10:18 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-10-22 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:24:14 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Failures detected for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
27 boots: 26 pass, 1 fail
110 tests: 110 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.114-rc1-g6a7f9259c323
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Boot failures: tegra30-cardhu-a04
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-22 17:56 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-10-22 17:58 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-23 10:16 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-23 10:18 ` Jon Hunter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-10-22 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie, linux-tegra, stable
Hi Greg,
On 22/10/2024 18:56, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:24:14 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
>> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.1:
> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> 27 boots: 26 pass, 1 fail
> 110 tests: 110 pass, 0 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.1.114-rc1-g6a7f9259c323
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Boot failures: tegra30-cardhu-a04
I am running a bisect to narrow this down. However, just wanted to
report this. Appears to be the same issue on linux-6.6.y.
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-22 17:58 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-10-23 10:16 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-10-23 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie, linux-tegra, stable
Hi Greg,
On 22/10/2024 18:58, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 22/10/2024 18:56, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:24:14 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
>>> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.1:
>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>> 27 boots: 26 pass, 1 fail
>> 110 tests: 110 pass, 0 fail
>>
>> Linux version: 6.1.114-rc1-g6a7f9259c323
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Boot failures: tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
>
> I am running a bisect to narrow this down. However, just wanted to
> report this. Appears to be the same issue on linux-6.6.y.
Ignore this, it appears to be bogus. Both v6.1 and v6.6 failed 3 times
while other kernels didn't. However, we are currently down to 1
tegra30-cardhu-a04 board in the farm and that one appears to be having
issues. I may need to drop that old entirely if we can't fix them.
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/91] 6.1.114-rc1 review
2024-10-22 17:56 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-22 17:58 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-10-23 10:18 ` Jon Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-10-23 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie, linux-tegra, stable
On 22/10/2024 18:56, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:24:14 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.114 release.
>> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.114-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.1:
> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> 27 boots: 26 pass, 1 fail
> 110 tests: 110 pass, 0 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.1.114-rc1-g6a7f9259c323
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Boot failures: tegra30-cardhu-a04
This appears to be a board issue. With that ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread