From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, void@manifault.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:37:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241030213735.GS14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyKlJXgXUqDpaQXp@slm.duckdns.org>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:29:09AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:15:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ...
> > > > + if (!(queue_flags & DEQUEUE_CLASS))
> > > > + check_prio_changed(task_rq(p), p, p->prio);
> > >
> > > Maybe prio_changed can be moved into scoped_guard?
> >
> > It wasn't before -- do you have need for it to be inside?
>
> No, was just wondering whether that'd make things a bit more compact. Either
> way is fine.
Oh, did you perhaps mean into sched_change_end() ? I suppose that's
possible indeed. Initially I thought that would require yet another
flags, but looking at it again, that doesn't seem to be the case. All
sched_change users lacking it never change the prio anyway.
I'll have a look at doing that tomorrow, with a slightly fresher brain.
I also think that adding flags to the switch*() methods isn't at all
needed, but perhaps it makes sense anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 15:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] clean up class switching Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/ext: Fix scx vs sched_delayed Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:50 ` Christian Loehle
2024-10-30 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 17:17 ` Christian Loehle
2024-10-30 20:19 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] sched: Employ sched_change guards Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:09 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] sched: Re-arrange the {EN,DE}QUEUE flags Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-10-30 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 15:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sched: Add flags to the switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() methods Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class switches Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241030213735.GS14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox