From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched/ext: Fix scx vs sched_delayed
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:50:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a20ccb66-0233-4e09-94cd-586133072c3c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241030152142.372771313@infradead.org>
On 10/30/24 15:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Commit 98442f0ccd82 ("sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs
> switched_from_fair()") forgot about scx :/
>
> Fixes: 98442f0ccd82 ("sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs switched_from_fair()")
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241030104934.GK14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -4489,11 +4489,16 @@ static void scx_ops_disable_workfn(struc
> scx_task_iter_start(&sti);
> while ((p = scx_task_iter_next_locked(&sti))) {
> const struct sched_class *old_class = p->sched_class;
> + const struct sched_class *new_class =
> + __setscheduler_class(p->policy, p->prio);
> struct sched_enq_and_set_ctx ctx;
>
> + if (old_class != new_class && p->se.sched_delayed)
> + dequeue_task(task_rq(p), p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
> +
> sched_deq_and_put_task(p, DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE, &ctx);
>
> - p->sched_class = __setscheduler_class(p->policy, p->prio);
> + p->sched_class = new_class;
> check_class_changing(task_rq(p), p, old_class);
>
> sched_enq_and_set_task(&ctx);
> @@ -5199,12 +5204,17 @@ static int scx_ops_enable(struct sched_e
> scx_task_iter_start(&sti);
> while ((p = scx_task_iter_next_locked(&sti))) {
> const struct sched_class *old_class = p->sched_class;
> + const struct sched_class *new_class =
> + __setscheduler_class(p->policy, p->prio);
> struct sched_enq_and_set_ctx ctx;
>
> + if (old_class != new_class && p->se.sched_delayed)
> + dequeue_task(task_rq(p), p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEE_DELAYED);
> +
s/DEQUEE_DELAYED/DEQUEUE_DELAYED
Anyway, no luck for me applying the series onto sched/core scx's for-next or rc5.
Any hint or do you mind supplying a branch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 15:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] clean up class switching Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/ext: Fix scx vs sched_delayed Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:50 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2024-10-30 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 17:17 ` Christian Loehle
2024-10-30 20:19 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] sched: Employ sched_change guards Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:09 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] sched: Re-arrange the {EN,DE}QUEUE flags Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 21:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-30 15:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sched: Add flags to the switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() methods Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class switches Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-30 21:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a20ccb66-0233-4e09-94cd-586133072c3c@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox