* [PATCH v2] [SCSI] esas2r: fix possible array out-of-bounds caused by bad DMA value in esas2r_process_vda_ioctl()
@ 2024-11-07 14:16 Qiu-ji Chen
2024-11-07 14:32 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Qiu-ji Chen @ 2024-11-07 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxdrivers, James.Bottomley, martin.petersen
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, Qiu-ji Chen, stable
In line 1854 of the file esas2r_ioctl.c, the function
esas2r_process_vda_ioctl() is called with the parameter vi being assigned
the value of a->vda_buffer. On line 1892, a->vda_buffer is stored in DMA
memory with the statement
a->vda_buffer = dma_alloc_coherent(&a->pcid->dev, ..., indicating that the
parameter vi passed to the function is also stored in DMA memory. This
suggests that the parameter vi could be altered at any time by malicious
hardware. If vi’s value is changed after the first conditional check
if (vi->function >= vercnt), it is likely that an array out-of-bounds
access could occur in the subsequent check
if (vi->version > esas2r_vdaioctl_versions[vi_function]), leading to
serious issues.
To fix this issue, we will store the value of vi->function in a local
variable to ensure that the subsequent checks remain valid.
Signed-off-by: Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 26780d9e12ed ("[SCSI] esas2r: ATTO Technology ExpressSAS 6G SAS/SATA RAID Adapter Driver")
---
V2:
Changed the incorrect patch title
---
drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_vda.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_vda.c b/drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_vda.c
index 30028e56df63..48af8c05b01d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_vda.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_vda.c
@@ -70,16 +70,17 @@ bool esas2r_process_vda_ioctl(struct esas2r_adapter *a,
u32 datalen = 0;
struct atto_vda_sge *firstsg = NULL;
u8 vercnt = (u8)ARRAY_SIZE(esas2r_vdaioctl_versions);
+ u8 vi_function = vi->function;
vi->status = ATTO_STS_SUCCESS;
vi->vda_status = RS_PENDING;
- if (vi->function >= vercnt) {
+ if (vi_function >= vercnt) {
vi->status = ATTO_STS_INV_FUNC;
return false;
}
- if (vi->version > esas2r_vdaioctl_versions[vi->function]) {
+ if (vi->version > esas2r_vdaioctl_versions[vi_function]) {
vi->status = ATTO_STS_INV_VERSION;
return false;
}
@@ -89,14 +90,14 @@ bool esas2r_process_vda_ioctl(struct esas2r_adapter *a,
return false;
}
- if (vi->function != VDA_FUNC_SCSI)
+ if (vi_function != VDA_FUNC_SCSI)
clear_vda_request(rq);
- rq->vrq->scsi.function = vi->function;
+ rq->vrq->scsi.function = vi_function;
rq->interrupt_cb = esas2r_complete_vda_ioctl;
rq->interrupt_cx = vi;
- switch (vi->function) {
+ switch (vi_function) {
case VDA_FUNC_FLASH:
if (vi->cmd.flash.sub_func != VDA_FLASH_FREAD
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] [SCSI] esas2r: fix possible array out-of-bounds caused by bad DMA value in esas2r_process_vda_ioctl()
2024-11-07 14:16 [PATCH v2] [SCSI] esas2r: fix possible array out-of-bounds caused by bad DMA value in esas2r_process_vda_ioctl() Qiu-ji Chen
@ 2024-11-07 14:32 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2024-11-07 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qiu-ji Chen, linuxdrivers, martin.petersen
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, stable
On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 22:16 +0800, Qiu-ji Chen wrote:
> In line 1854 of the file esas2r_ioctl.c, the function
> esas2r_process_vda_ioctl() is called with the parameter vi being
> assigned the value of a->vda_buffer. On line 1892, a->vda_buffer is
> stored in DMA memory with the statement a->vda_buffer =
> dma_alloc_coherent(&a->pcid->dev, ..., indicating that the
> parameter vi passed to the function is also stored in DMA memory.
> This suggests that the parameter vi could be altered at any time by
> malicious hardware.
Absent a specific threat (such as TPM with an interposer) this isn't a
vector the kernel protects against (we have to believe what hardware
says unless we know it to be specifically buggy about something).
However, even supposing a PCI Interposer were considered a threat, the
answer now is hardware based: SPDM/PCI-IDE.
Regards,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-07 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-07 14:16 [PATCH v2] [SCSI] esas2r: fix possible array out-of-bounds caused by bad DMA value in esas2r_process_vda_ioctl() Qiu-ji Chen
2024-11-07 14:32 ` James Bottomley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox