* [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 1/4] uprobes: sanitiize xol_free_insn_slot()
@ 2024-11-24 12:46 Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 2/4] perf/x86/amd: Warn only on new bits set Sasha Levin
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-11-24 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Sasha Levin, mhiramat, mingo, acme,
namhyung, linux-trace-kernel, linux-perf-users
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit c7b4133c48445dde789ed30b19ccb0448c7593f7 ]
1. Clear utask->xol_vaddr unconditionally, even if this addr is not valid,
xol_free_insn_slot() should never return with utask->xol_vaddr != NULL.
2. Add a comment to explain why do we need to validate slot_addr.
3. Simplify the validation above. We can simply check offset < PAGE_SIZE,
unsigned underflows are fine, it should work if slot_addr < area->vaddr.
4. Kill the unnecessary "slot_nr >= UINSNS_PER_PAGE" check, slot_nr must
be valid if offset < PAGE_SIZE.
The next patches will cleanup this function even more.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240929144235.GA9471@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 6dac0b5798213..5ce3d189e33c2 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1629,8 +1629,8 @@ static unsigned long xol_get_insn_slot(struct uprobe *uprobe)
static void xol_free_insn_slot(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct xol_area *area;
- unsigned long vma_end;
unsigned long slot_addr;
+ unsigned long offset;
if (!tsk->mm || !tsk->mm->uprobes_state.xol_area || !tsk->utask)
return;
@@ -1639,24 +1639,21 @@ static void xol_free_insn_slot(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (unlikely(!slot_addr))
return;
+ tsk->utask->xol_vaddr = 0;
area = tsk->mm->uprobes_state.xol_area;
- vma_end = area->vaddr + PAGE_SIZE;
- if (area->vaddr <= slot_addr && slot_addr < vma_end) {
- unsigned long offset;
- int slot_nr;
-
- offset = slot_addr - area->vaddr;
- slot_nr = offset / UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES;
- if (slot_nr >= UINSNS_PER_PAGE)
- return;
+ offset = slot_addr - area->vaddr;
+ /*
+ * slot_addr must fit into [area->vaddr, area->vaddr + PAGE_SIZE).
+ * This check can only fail if the "[uprobes]" vma was mremap'ed.
+ */
+ if (offset < PAGE_SIZE) {
+ int slot_nr = offset / UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES;
clear_bit(slot_nr, area->bitmap);
atomic_dec(&area->slot_count);
smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* pairs with prepare_to_wait() */
if (waitqueue_active(&area->wq))
wake_up(&area->wq);
-
- tsk->utask->xol_vaddr = 0;
}
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 2/4] perf/x86/amd: Warn only on new bits set
2024-11-24 12:46 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 1/4] uprobes: sanitiize xol_free_insn_slot() Sasha Levin
@ 2024-11-24 12:46 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 4/4] timekeeping: Always check for negative motion Sasha Levin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-11-24 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Breno Leitao, Paul E . McKenney, Peter Zijlstra, Sandipan Das,
Sasha Levin, mingo, acme, namhyung, tglx, bp, dave.hansen, x86,
linux-perf-users
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
[ Upstream commit de20037e1b3c2f2ca97b8c12b8c7bca8abd509a7 ]
Warning at every leaking bits can cause a flood of message, triggering
various stall-warning mechanisms to fire, including CSD locks, which
makes the machine to be unusable.
Track the bits that are being leaked, and only warn when a new bit is
set.
That said, this patch will help with the following issues:
1) It will tell us which bits are being set, so, it is easy to
communicate it back to vendor, and to do a root-cause analyzes.
2) It avoid the machine to be unusable, because, worst case
scenario, the user gets less than 60 WARNs (one per unhandled bit).
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241001141020.2620361-1-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
index 8ed10366c4a27..aa8fc2cf1bde7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
@@ -895,11 +895,12 @@ static int amd_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
static int amd_pmu_v2_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+ static atomic64_t status_warned = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
+ u64 reserved, status, mask, new_bits, prev_bits;
struct perf_sample_data data;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
struct perf_event *event;
int handled = 0, idx;
- u64 reserved, status, mask;
bool pmu_enabled;
/*
@@ -964,7 +965,12 @@ static int amd_pmu_v2_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
* the corresponding PMCs are expected to be inactive according to the
* active_mask
*/
- WARN_ON(status > 0);
+ if (status > 0) {
+ prev_bits = atomic64_fetch_or(status, &status_warned);
+ // A new bit was set for the very first time.
+ new_bits = status & ~prev_bits;
+ WARN(new_bits, "New overflows for inactive PMCs: %llx\n", new_bits);
+ }
/* Clear overflow and freeze bits */
amd_pmu_ack_global_status(~status);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements
2024-11-24 12:46 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 1/4] uprobes: sanitiize xol_free_insn_slot() Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 2/4] perf/x86/amd: Warn only on new bits set Sasha Levin
@ 2024-11-24 12:46 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 15:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 4/4] timekeeping: Always check for negative motion Sasha Levin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-11-24 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Thomas Hellström, Peter Zijlstra, Sasha Levin, mingo, will
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 823a566221a5639f6c69424897218e5d6431a970 ]
When using mutex_acquire_nest() with a nest_lock, lockdep refcounts the
number of acquired lockdep_maps of mutexes of the same class, and also
keeps a pointer to the first acquired lockdep_map of a class. That pointer
is then used for various comparison-, printing- and checking purposes,
but there is no mechanism to actively ensure that lockdep_map stays in
memory. Instead, a warning is printed if the lockdep_map is freed and
there are still held locks of the same lock class, even if the lockdep_map
itself has been released.
In the context of WW/WD transactions that means that if a user unlocks
and frees a ww_mutex from within an ongoing ww transaction, and that
mutex happens to be the first ww_mutex grabbed in the transaction,
such a warning is printed and there might be a risk of a UAF.
Note that this is only problem when lockdep is enabled and affects only
dereferences of struct lockdep_map.
Adjust to this by adding a fake lockdep_map to the acquired context and
make sure it is the first acquired lockdep map of the associated
ww_mutex class. Then hold it for the duration of the WW/WD transaction.
This has the side effect that trying to lock a ww mutex *without* a
ww_acquire_context but where a such context has been acquire, we'd see
a lockdep splat. The test-ww_mutex.c selftest attempts to do that, so
modify that particular test to not acquire a ww_acquire_context if it
is not going to be used.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009092031.6356-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index bb763085479af..a401a2f31a775 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -65,6 +65,16 @@ struct ww_acquire_ctx {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
+ /**
+ * @first_lock_dep_map: fake lockdep_map for first locked ww_mutex.
+ *
+ * lockdep requires the lockdep_map for the first locked ww_mutex
+ * in a ww transaction to remain in memory until all ww_mutexes of
+ * the transaction have been unlocked. Ensure this by keeping a
+ * fake locked ww_mutex lockdep map between ww_acquire_init() and
+ * ww_acquire_fini().
+ */
+ struct lockdep_map first_lock_dep_map;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
unsigned int deadlock_inject_interval;
@@ -146,7 +156,10 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
lockdep_init_map(&ctx->dep_map, ww_class->acquire_name,
&ww_class->acquire_key, 0);
+ lockdep_init_map(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, ww_class->mutex_name,
+ &ww_class->mutex_key, 0);
mutex_acquire(&ctx->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ mutex_acquire_nest(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, 0, 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
ctx->deadlock_inject_interval = 1;
@@ -185,6 +198,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ mutex_release(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
mutex_release(&ctx->dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
#endif
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 7c5a8f05497f2..02b84288865ca 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
int ret;
ww_mutex_init(&mtx.mutex, &ww_class);
- ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+ if (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX)
+ ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&mtx.work, test_mutex_work);
init_completion(&mtx.ready);
@@ -90,7 +91,8 @@ static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mtx.done, TIMEOUT);
}
ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx.mutex);
- ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+ if (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX)
+ ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s(flags=%x): mutual exclusion failure\n",
@@ -663,7 +665,7 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = stress(2047, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
+ ret = stress(2046, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 4/4] timekeeping: Always check for negative motion
2024-11-24 12:46 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 1/4] uprobes: sanitiize xol_free_insn_slot() Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 2/4] perf/x86/amd: Warn only on new bits set Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements Sasha Levin
@ 2024-11-24 12:46 ` Sasha Levin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-11-24 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, John Stultz, Sasha Levin, mingo, bp, dave.hansen,
x86, rdunlap, paulmck
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit c163e40af9b2331b2c629fd4ec8b703ed4d4ae39 ]
clocksource_delta() has two variants. One with a check for negative motion,
which is only selected by x86. This is a historic leftover as this function
was previously used in the time getter hot paths.
Since 135225a363ae timekeeping_cycles_to_ns() has unconditional protection
against this as a by-product of the protection against 64bit math overflow.
clocksource_delta() is only used in the clocksource watchdog and in
timekeeping_advance(). The extra conditional there is not hurting anyone.
Remove the config option and unconditionally prevent negative motion of the
readout.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031120328.599430157@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
kernel/time/Kconfig | 5 -----
kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h | 7 -------
3 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 05c82fd5d0f60..a8bff6520bd61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ config X86
select ARCH_HAS_PARANOID_L1D_FLUSH
select BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT
select CLKEVT_I8253
- select CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
select CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
# Word-size accesses may read uninitialized data past the trailing \0
# in strings and cause false KMSAN reports.
diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
index bae8f11070bef..1f0f86e51d042 100644
--- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
@@ -17,11 +17,6 @@ config ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA
config ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_INIT
bool
-# Clocksources require validation of the clocksource against the last
-# cycle update - x86/TSC misfeature
-config CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
- bool
-
# Timekeeping vsyscall support
config GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL
bool
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h b/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
index 4ca2787d1642e..1d4854d5c386e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ extern void tk_debug_account_sleep_time(const struct timespec64 *t);
#define tk_debug_account_sleep_time(x)
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
{
u64 ret = (now - last) & mask;
@@ -26,12 +25,6 @@ static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
*/
return ret & ~(mask >> 1) ? 0 : ret;
}
-#else
-static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
-{
- return (now - last) & mask;
-}
-#endif
/* Semi public for serialization of non timekeeper VDSO updates. */
extern raw_spinlock_t timekeeper_lock;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements Sasha Levin
@ 2024-11-25 15:52 ` Thomas Hellström
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Hellström @ 2024-11-25 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, mingo, will
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 07:46 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 823a566221a5639f6c69424897218e5d6431a970 ]
>
> When using mutex_acquire_nest() with a nest_lock, lockdep refcounts
> the
> number of acquired lockdep_maps of mutexes of the same class, and
> also
> keeps a pointer to the first acquired lockdep_map of a class. That
> pointer
> is then used for various comparison-, printing- and checking
> purposes,
> but there is no mechanism to actively ensure that lockdep_map stays
> in
> memory. Instead, a warning is printed if the lockdep_map is freed and
> there are still held locks of the same lock class, even if the
> lockdep_map
> itself has been released.
>
> In the context of WW/WD transactions that means that if a user
> unlocks
> and frees a ww_mutex from within an ongoing ww transaction, and that
> mutex happens to be the first ww_mutex grabbed in the transaction,
> such a warning is printed and there might be a risk of a UAF.
>
> Note that this is only problem when lockdep is enabled and affects
> only
> dereferences of struct lockdep_map.
>
> Adjust to this by adding a fake lockdep_map to the acquired context
> and
> make sure it is the first acquired lockdep map of the associated
> ww_mutex class. Then hold it for the duration of the WW/WD
> transaction.
>
> This has the side effect that trying to lock a ww mutex *without* a
> ww_acquire_context but where a such context has been acquire, we'd
> see
> a lockdep splat. The test-ww_mutex.c selftest attempts to do that, so
> modify that particular test to not acquire a ww_acquire_context if it
> is not going to be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009092031.6356-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The commit introduces regressions and should not be backported, please
see the corresponding patch for 6.12 for a discussion.
Thanks,
Thomas
> ---
> include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> index bb763085479af..a401a2f31a775 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,16 @@ struct ww_acquire_ctx {
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> + /**
> + * @first_lock_dep_map: fake lockdep_map for first locked
> ww_mutex.
> + *
> + * lockdep requires the lockdep_map for the first locked
> ww_mutex
> + * in a ww transaction to remain in memory until all
> ww_mutexes of
> + * the transaction have been unlocked. Ensure this by
> keeping a
> + * fake locked ww_mutex lockdep map between
> ww_acquire_init() and
> + * ww_acquire_fini().
> + */
> + struct lockdep_map first_lock_dep_map;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
> unsigned int deadlock_inject_interval;
> @@ -146,7 +156,10 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct
> ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
> lockdep_init_map(&ctx->dep_map, ww_class->acquire_name,
> &ww_class->acquire_key, 0);
> + lockdep_init_map(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, ww_class-
> >mutex_name,
> + &ww_class->mutex_key, 0);
> mutex_acquire(&ctx->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> + mutex_acquire_nest(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, 0, 0, &ctx-
> >dep_map, _RET_IP_);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
> ctx->deadlock_inject_interval = 1;
> @@ -185,6 +198,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct
> ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + mutex_release(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> mutex_release(&ctx->dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> #endif
> #ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-
> ww_mutex.c
> index 7c5a8f05497f2..02b84288865ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
> int ret;
>
> ww_mutex_init(&mtx.mutex, &ww_class);
> - ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
> + if (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX)
> + ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
>
> INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&mtx.work, test_mutex_work);
> init_completion(&mtx.ready);
> @@ -90,7 +91,8 @@ static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
> ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mtx.done,
> TIMEOUT);
> }
> ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx.mutex);
> - ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
> + if (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX)
> + ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s(flags=%x): mutual exclusion failure\n",
> @@ -663,7 +665,7 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = stress(2047, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
> + ret = stress(2046, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-25 15:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-24 12:46 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 1/4] uprobes: sanitiize xol_free_insn_slot() Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 2/4] perf/x86/amd: Warn only on new bits set Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 3/4] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 15:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-11-24 12:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 4/4] timekeeping: Always check for negative motion Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox