From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Hanno Böck" <hanno@hboeck.de>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Jared Finder" <jared@finder.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jwilk@jwilk.net
Subject: Re: GPM & Emacs broken in Linux 6.7 -- ok to relax check?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:49:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024121726-electable-tabloid-bf55@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217094723.57c7cb1c.hanno@hboeck.de>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:47:23AM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:53:27 +0100
> "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Hanno, you are the original author of this patch and you have done a
> > more detailed analysis on the TIOCLINUX problems than me -- do you
> > agree that this weakened check would still be sufficient to protect
> > against the TIOCLINUX problems? (Or in other words, if we permitted
> > TIOCL_SELPOINTER, TIOCL_SELCLEAR and TIOCL_SELMOUSEREPORT for
> > non-CAP_SYS_ADMIN processes, would you still see a way to misuse that
> > functionality?)
>
> Sorry for the late feedback.
>
> I believe that this is correct, and permitting these functionalities
> still preserves the security fix. I also checked with Jakub Wilk, who
> was the original author of the exploit.
> The patch you posted in the meantime[1] should be fine.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/Z2BKetPygDM36X-X@google.com/T/#u
Great, can you test that and if it works for you, provide a tested-by
line?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ee3ec63269b43b34e1c90dd8c9743bf8@finder.org>
2024-11-29 19:50 ` GPM & Emacs broken in Linux 6.7 -- ok to relax check? Jann Horn
2024-12-03 13:53 ` Günther Noack
2024-12-03 14:07 ` Günther Noack
2024-12-14 5:13 ` Jared Finder
2024-12-14 7:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-16 15:07 ` [PATCH] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN Günther Noack
2024-12-16 15:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-16 15:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-16 15:42 ` Günther Noack
2024-12-21 11:06 ` Günther Noack
2024-12-21 11:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Günther Noack
2024-12-22 8:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-10 14:21 ` Günther Noack
2025-01-10 16:50 ` Kees Cook
2025-02-08 15:18 ` Jared Finder
2025-02-08 15:28 ` Greg KH
2025-02-08 16:03 ` Jared Finder
2025-02-09 6:49 ` Greg KH
2025-02-21 0:10 ` Günther Noack
2025-02-22 21:07 ` Jared Finder
2025-01-12 13:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 9:09 ` [PATCH] " Günther Noack
2024-12-17 8:47 ` GPM & Emacs broken in Linux 6.7 -- ok to relax check? Hanno Böck
2024-12-17 8:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024121726-electable-tabloid-bf55@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=hanno@hboeck.de \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jared@finder.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=jwilk@jwilk.net \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox