* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-12-17 20:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-19 16:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 23:00 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-12-17 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/17/24 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
perf fails to build with:
evlist.c: In function '__perf_evlist__propagate_maps':
evlist.c:55:21: error: implicit declaration of function
'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'; did you mean 'perf_cpu_map__empty'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
55 | if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(evsel->cpus)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_cpu_map__empty
evlist.c:55:21: error: nested extern declaration of
'perf_cpu_map__is_empty' [-Werror=nested-externs]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: ***
[/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:98:
/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/libperf/evlist.o]
Error 1
this is caused by 74d444cca1eb616912c3ffe4b8a060a7bb192618 ("libperf:
evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform")
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 20:00 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-19 16:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-12-19 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:00:51PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/17/24 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> > There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> perf fails to build with:
>
> evlist.c: In function '__perf_evlist__propagate_maps':
> evlist.c:55:21: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'; did you mean 'perf_cpu_map__empty'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 55 | if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(evsel->cpus)) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | perf_cpu_map__empty
> evlist.c:55:21: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'
> [-Werror=nested-externs]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[6]: *** [/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:98: /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/libperf/evlist.o]
> Error 1
>
> this is caused by 74d444cca1eb616912c3ffe4b8a060a7bb192618 ("libperf:
> evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform")
Now dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 20:00 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-17 23:00 ` Shuah Khan
2024-12-18 5:49 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-12-17 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 12/17/24 10:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 20:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-17 23:00 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-12-18 5:49 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-12-19 16:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-18 6:49 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-12-18 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 17/12/24 22:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
This below commit is causing perf build failure, could you please drop this:
> James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform
evlist.c: In function '__perf_evlist__propagate_maps':
evlist.c:55:21: error: implicit declaration of function
'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'; did you mean 'perf_cpu_map__empty'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
55 | if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(evsel->cpus)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_cpu_map__empty
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-18 5:49 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-12-19 16:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-12-19 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harshit Mogalapalli
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:19:48AM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 17/12/24 22:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> > There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> This below commit is causing perf build failure, could you please drop this:
>
> > James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> > libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform
>
> evlist.c: In function '__perf_evlist__propagate_maps':
> evlist.c:55:21: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'; did you mean 'perf_cpu_map__empty'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 55 | if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(evsel->cpus)) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | perf_cpu_map__empty
>
offending ncommit should now be dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 5:49 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-12-18 6:49 ` Ron Economos
2024-12-18 12:11 ` Peter Schneider
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-12-18 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/17/24 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 6:49 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-12-18 12:11 ` Peter Schneider
2024-12-18 12:37 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-12-18 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 17.12.2024 um 18:06 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 12:11 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-12-18 12:37 ` Mark Brown
2024-12-18 14:13 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-12-18 17:23 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-12-18 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:06:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 12:37 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-12-18 14:13 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-12-18 17:23 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-12-18 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 22:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The all i386 builds failed with the gcc-13 and clang-19
toolchain builds on following branches,
- linux-6.12.y
- linux-6.6.y
- linux-6.1.y
- linux-5.15.y
- linux-5.10.y
* i386, build
- clang-19-defconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Build log:
-------------
i686-linux-gnu-ld: arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o: in function
`__static_call_update_early':
static_call.c:(.noinstr.text+0x15): undefined reference to
`static_call_initialized'
The recent commit on this file is,
x86/static-call: provide a way to do very early static-call updates
commit 0ef8047b737d7480a5d4c46d956e97c190f13050 upstream.
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7/testrun/26374041/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allnoconfig/log
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.67-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 584b6d5f2ac73fe77fccd81f9a56dc144dc143ef
* git describe: v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.65-357-gae86bb742fa8)
* i386, build
- clang-19-allnoconfig
- clang-19-defconfig
- clang-19-lkftconfig
- clang-19-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
- clang-19-tinyconfig
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allnoconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
- gcc-13-lkftconfig
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-kunit
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture
- gcc-13-tinyconfig
- gcc-8-allnoconfig
- gcc-8-i386_defconfig
- gcc-8-tinyconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.65-357-gae86bb742fa8)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.65-357-gae86bb742fa8)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.65-357-gae86bb742fa8)
## Test result summary
total: 131803, pass: 107195, fail: 3174, skip: 21379, xfail: 55
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 128 total, 128 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 0 passed, 27 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-sm[
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 14:13 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-12-18 17:23 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-12-18 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On 17/12/2024 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.67-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 112 pass, 4 fail
Linux version: 6.6.67-rc1-g584b6d5f2ac7
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
tegra186-p2771-0000: tegra-audio-dmic-capture.sh
tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
tegra194-p2972-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread